An important update on the Panama private storage facility

by Simon Black · 10 comments

January 25, 2010

Panama City, Panama

A few weeks ago, I told you about a new private vault facility that was opening soon in Panama called “Best Safety Boxes.” At the time, I had not personally checked out the facility but at least wanted to make you aware of its opening.

Late last week, I had the opportunity to meet with the owners and take a personal tour of the facility. In full disclosure, I have decided against renting a box at the facility simply because I refuse to submit my biometric data for storage.

Furthermore, to make things even more clear, I want you to understand that I am receiving absolutely no compensation to say this, and I have no interest in the company, financial or otherwise.

The Good:

Security. Best Safety Boxes may be one of the most secure buildings in Panama. There are dozens of security features, high-tech and low-tech, including reinforced, bullet-proof glass, biometric scanners, one of the industry’s highest-rated vaults, backup redundancy monitoring systems, and of course, big guys with big guns. Simply put, Best Safety Boxes has better security than Ricardo Martinelli.

Anonymous ownership.  With the use of Panama’s bearer share structures, the identity of a box lessee can be kept completely secret.

Location. If you are from North America and distance is a factor, you may find Panama to be the most convenient offshore jurisdiction to store gold and silver. Within Panama City, the Best Safety Box facility is conveniently and strategically located next to a bank and nearby a police station and private security company.

The Bad:

Lack of fire suppression. There is no fire suppression system in the main vault room at the Best Safety facility; this is a potential risk in my opinion given that there may be flammables under storage in some of the boxes.

Lack of privacy. While the identity of a box owner can be anonymous, the identity of the individual who accesses the box is recorded– anyone who enters/exits the facility is required to provide identification, and the entire facility is under recorded video surveillance. Additionally, biometric data for individuals with box access is collected and stored at off-site locations.

The Uncertain:

Price. Starting at $400 per year for a small box, Best Safety Boxes is substantially higher than boxes in Singapore or Hong Kong. Of course, the plane ticket to Panama is much cheaper than the ticket to Asia if you are from North America, so this may be negligible.

Gold Market. The gold market in Panama is growing, but still quite small. If you come down to Panama with a lot of gold, you may find it difficult to find a buyer of any significant volume.

Ownership. Hilt Tatum, one of the facility’s owners, had his reputation besmudged by a handful of bloggers over an online gambling scandal. I have not conducted my own formal investigation into the matter, but after reading several websites that allege Mr. Tatum’s wrongdoing, all I found were rumor and innuendo rather than hard, credible evidence.

For this reason, I wanted to hear Mr. Tatum’s side of the story.  Here’s the deal– I found him to be a credible and candid person, and his own explanation that he was not connected to the scandal certainly seemed plausible.

In my opinion, it seems highly unlikely to me that someone would spend a great deal of time and money to create a very profitable business in Panama, only to eventually rob the boxholders of their belongings. Even if Mr. Tatum were morally bent, it would be easier, less risky, an more profitable to continue operating the business, which I’m sure will make him a great deal of money.

If you have any doubts whatsoever, you should come down to Panama yourself and meet with the owners to form your own opinion.

Want More Information Like This?
Sign up below for the free newsletter Sovereign Man: Notes From The Field to get more information like the article you just read, plus exclusive information that is not posted publicly.


  • Nick

    Hi Simon,
    Thanks for the info.

    Have you noticed that biometric security has been dropped from laptops recently?

    This is because there is one very large security hole in all biometric based security. That is that your fingerprints, retina etc are unique to you and never change.

    This means that a “hacker” has your lifetime to crack the encryption which is ample time to crack even the best encryption currently available.

    IMO biometric might look cool in the movies but it really isn’t all it’s cracked up to be any you have this personal information stored by someone, somewhere. So much for anonimity.

    Unfortunately, the most popular way to hack a system is from the inside or trick /bribe an insider into giving up the info.

  • Purewater

    I can’t remember your interview with Hilt exactly, but didn’t he tell you he came to Central America to work in the timber industry? Seems a bit disingenuous…

  • Patrice Ackerman

    Anyone can have better security than Ricardo Martinelli. When we went to Panama two months ago we went after hours to the “Panama White House” and got to see him in person as he pulled out of the garage.

  • http://none Rex

    Hi Smith and Simon. You all asked the question earlier about if we like the audio interviews??? “WE LOVE THEM!!!” I like to put them in my mp3 player for the on the go listening. Remember, this information is like a golden rope for all of us who are stuck in the U.S. while we get into the lifestyle design and the NR [new rich (lifestyle)] We are still being hounded by this industrial idea that we go to college and get a job for 50 years then retire…ummmm I am thinking other prosperous alternatives. Please keep up the good work. thanks!

  • Elai

    @Nick
    Using Biometric Information alone as an encryption key is foolish, but as part of a 3-factor authentication system (something you are, something you have, and something you know), it is useful. Also fingerprint login readers are useful like house door locks. They effectively work for most people, but really aren’t the greatest in locking something up.

  • Me

    Personally I would be happy with Biometrics or any other security system if it weren’t for the fact that the data has to be stored somewhere. Even if the data is kept confidential that is only until some drastic legislature is introduced (for the good of all citizens) and backed up with guns. Therefore I will not be submitting my data to anybody anywhere ever. I would consider a biometric scanning system whereby you control the system yourself. A home safe or even entrance to your own property would all make sense since data is kept by you and nobody else.

    Here’s what I have done in case anyone is interested. A personal safe bought and paid for by myself kept in homes of relatives in jurisdictions that you are comfortable with. I keep the codes and keys. Ditto for family members. I have a couple of safes kept for relatives. They keep the codes and keys. Very simple. It works for someone like me having a scattered family. Jurisdictions for me have landed up being Singapore, Australia and the UK.

  • Bill

    Have you reviewed private vault facilities in the USA? There is 24/7 in Las Vegas and American Locktight in St. George Utah. They use biometrics as well. I don’t believe they require further identification for access. There is another facility in Los Altos, CA. There are others further east in the USA.

    If one truly has anonymous access to a private vault in the USA, why would an American go to Panama?

    • Roy

      Bill,

      Do you know of any Private Vault facilities on the east coast of the USA? There is also Robovault in Ft Lauderdale

  • hbs

    is there any good reason not to use Switzerland for your offshore gold storage? I don’t think anyplace else compares.

Previous post:

Next post: