How can you have any pudding if you don’t eat your meat?

HOW CAN YOU HAVE ANY PUDDING IF YOU DON’T EAT YOUR MEAT

May 21, 2012
Los Angeles, USA

I had the privilege of seeing Roger Waters perform ‘The Wall’ to a live crowd of over 40,000 fans at the LA Coliseum on Saturday night– the second time I’ve seen the show on this tour.

It was an amazing production– I wholeheartedly recommend the experience as it’s something that no DVD or album recording could possibly reproduce.

At one point, Waters paused his set and began telling the audience about Jean Charles de Menezes, a 27-year old Brazilian national who was shot *8-times* by British police several years ago at a south London tube station after being mistakenly identified as a terrorist.

The police, adhering to the ‘shoot first, ask questions later’ model of peace enforcement, have never been held accountable for taking the life of an innocent man at point blank range.

“If we stand at the top of the slope and give our governments, and particularly our police, too much power, it’s a very long and dangerous slippery slope to the bottom,” Waters said.

The crowd went berserk, roaring with approval.

It certainly gives one hope that the message is sinking in; most folks, it seems, have a conceptual  understanding that governments are corrupt and abusive… but at the end of the day, they’ll still fall in line behind the political system.

An entire lifetime of programming, starting practically at birth, reinforces that government and police are the ‘good guys’. It’s a difficult inclination to break.

The stories that we all hear on an almost daily basis about corruption and abuse of power are appalling indeed. But most people think that they’re just aberrations in an otherwise good system… and that it’s just not going to happen to them.

Until it does.

George Reby is a great example. The New Jersey resident was driving on I-40 in Tennessee when he was stopped for speeding. The officer then asked him if he was carrying large amounts of cash.

Reby said that he had about $20,000, upon which the officer asked if he could search the vehicle.

Reby consented, saying later, “I certainly didn’t feel like I was doing anything wrong…”

You can probably tell where this is going… the officer promptly confiscated the cash, claiming that it might be used for drug trafficking. Reby explained that he was on his way to buy a car he’d found on eBay (and even showed him the eBay ad), and showed that the source of funds were legitimate.

It didn’t matter. He had his money stolen in the most insidious way…by a thuggish, criminal agent of the government (who was sporting a rather menacing neck tattoo).

At least a real criminal knows what he’s doing is wrong; he knows that he’s committing an immoral act by shooting or robbing someone. The police, on the other hand, think their actions are legitimate, that they’re just ‘doing their job.’

This is intellectually dishonest and morally reprehensible. Everyone involved, including the officer himself, agreed that Reby committed no crime… that it’s perfectly legal to carry cash.

Yet citizens like Reby are routinely relieved of their hard-earned savings, and then have to spend thousands of dollars fighting to get it back.

As it turns out, police have a huge incentive to steal; they get a healthy cut of the proceeds from any asset seizure, and the funds go to pay for new toys like those whiz bang Camaro hot rod police cruisers.

You can check out Reby’s disgraceful story here:

It goes to show that this idea of “I’ve done nothing wrong, I’ve got nothing to hide, so I have nothing to fear…” is completely bogus.

People who are completely innocent of any wrongdoing can still have their lives turned upside down by a corrupt government that has an incentive to plunder its citizens.

Yet every time we turn around, they’ve managed to award themselves more power, more authority.

From the NDAA which authorizes the military detention of US citizens on US soil, to President Obama’s executive order authorizing government confiscation of practically everything, to the UK’s new plan to monitor all mobile, phone, email, and text messages going in, out, or through the country.

From Rome to the Ottoman Empire, history is full of examples of failing, insolvent governments that resort to similar tactics of desperately pillaging the wealth and freedoms of their citizens. The conclusions we can draw from this are simple:

1) The trend for failing states is to grant themselves more power.
1) Power, once granted, is almost impossible to take back.
2) More power means more abuse of power.
3) It can (and does) happen to anyone.

Putting any faith in an insolvent government to do the right thing is absurd… and it behooves everyone to safeguard important assets and interests by diversifying internationally.

Get Free Updates and Build Your Freedom
Join 117,239+ subscribers and get my Notes from the Field newsletter with actionable information on how to build your freedom
arrow 3 How can you have any pudding if you dont eat your meat?

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • http://www.bzemic.com/impossibleInstinct/ steve ward

    sigh…………then again there has always been corrupt cops

  • http://profiles.google.com/corinnanairn Corinna Nairn

    Thanks for posting that video… that is absolute craziness.

  • http://www.example.com/ Uživatel Internetu

    With all due respect, there is no rule of law left in the US, and the police are much more corrupt in the US than they are in say Mexico. The US is notorious for police corruption.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Paul-Farah/100000689749486 Paul Farah

    You misnumbered your bullet points at the bottom of the article.  but you also forgot something important in those points:  The increase of power causes the state to fail worse, thus completing the downward cycle. 
    But as the cycle gets worse, a few side effects happen that doom the system.  These include, but are not limited to:  Falling birthrates, people fleeing the system, and people just plain quitting and to contributing to society anymore.
    the question is not “how can we save our system?” for it cannot be saved any longer.  It is best to just watch it crash.  The question is what do we replace it with when it is over.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_57HRUK25DDMUHFB4XFI7GTGASQ Joe

       A simple question with a simple answer.  Nothing.

  • John Redman

    “Putting any faith in an insolvent government to do the right thing is
    absurd… and it behooves everyone to safeguard important assets and
    interests by diversifying internationally.” Might I point out that putting ones faith in ANY but God is mortal sin. Putting faith in assets, too, is sin AND foolish.

  • Paul Samson

    You might want to fix the numbering at the end… 1) is repeated.

  • Kari Johnson

    Last night there was a story on the news of a guy who was sentenced to life for killing a father of 2 in a car accident. He’s eligible for parole in 7 years. Ok..pretty normal there. Not right, but normal. But the guy had already had 153 convictions. Some of them violent. 153! It would seem that somewhere around 40 or 50 convictions we need to lock people up forever where forever means forever. But then at $100k+ per year to store a person like that the next question is why? Clearly he’s broken. Clearly there’ll be no rehabilitation. So what’s the point of keeping him alive. Why pay for someone like that. I’m sure there are thousands and thousands just like him who fit that bill. Harsh? Cruel? Not really. The guy is just permanently screwed up. So why not dust him and all like him. That leaves room for more who might be rehabilitated. If they’re not and come back, they get dusted too. Where this is going for this article is… With more people going to real jail and less repeat offenders (they’re dead by now), that leaves way more room to be incredibly strict with our our own authority’s conduct themselves. Crooked cop. Same course as the ‘bad guys’. At some point 20 years down the road we’d end up with less jammed jails, way less repeat offenders on the street, and likely police forces who have weeded out their bad guys.  At some point, crappy as it is, we’re going to have to come to the acknowledgement that the only way to stop a lot of this is simply to eliminate the worst people doing it. There’s always an argument whether capital punishment is a true deterrent. In many countries (Singapore, Saudi Arabia etc) it is. But lets say it’s not. Why not just kill off all the people like the guy described above and move forward. Less work for the police. And more opportunity to scrutinize the police more too.

Next Post:

Previous Post:

Read more:
It’s raining profit in Australia
Close