Introducing the government’s newest unpaid spy: YOU

February 8, 2012
Santiago, Chile

One of the most terrifying aspects of George Orwell’s seminal work 1984 was his description of how society had turned into one giant police agency. People were encouraged to rat each other out, groomed since childhood to be unpaid government spies:

“[Children] adored the Party and everything connected with it… All their ferocity was turned outwards, against the enemies of the State, against foreigners, traitors, saboteurs, thought-criminals. It was almost normal for people over thirty to be frightened of their own children.”

The Department of Homeland Security’s “If you see something, say something…” is not too far off from this paradigm– encouraging citizens to rat each other out to the police for the mere suspicion of potential wrong-doing.

DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano even made a special appearance at last Sunday’s Super Bowl to get the message out about ‘public vigilance,’ and ensure that the entire city of Indianapolis was blanketed with advertisements from her Big Brother campaign.

DHS Introducing the governments newest unpaid spy: YOU

The IRS has been encouraging this type of behavior for years, rewarding citizens with a share of collections for anyone who snitches on potential tax cheats. Last year the agency upped its reward payout for tax informants, topping out at a full 30%.

A few months ago, the Mayor of Newark, NJ announced a similar program designed to reward citizens for snitching on gun owners. According to the mayor, “We don’t even have to have a conviction,” for an informant to get paid a cool $1,000 cash. Rat out your neighbor, get paid. Simple.

(As an aside, police in neighboring East Orange, NJ have rolled out a new pre-crime surveillance system. In the words of Police Chief William Robinson, “The police are observing you. The police are recording you. And the police are responding.” Big Brother is clearly watching.)

In the financial system, there are droves of civilian agencies that have been coerced into becoming government spies. As we discussed a few weeks ago, everyone from bankers to brokers to gold dealers are obliged to submit ‘suspicious activity reports’ to the federal government. They even have minimum quotas.

What’s more, these so-called “SARs” must remain top-secret. It’s a crime for your banker to inform you that you were the subject of a suspicious activity report.

Yesterday, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the federal agency which oversees the legions of unpaid government spies, added a few more businesses to the list. Now non-bank mortgage lenders and originators must ‘assist law enforcement’ by submitting suspicious activity reports.

The rule will take effect in the spring. What’s ambiguous is whether or not it will apply to -individuals- who hold and issue private mortgages.

Despite 50 pages of new regulations, the definition of ‘residential mortgage lender’ remains unclear. This is common with laws and regulations… they take up a lot of space, but they’re incredibly vague. Based on the published text:

  • Individuals who finance the sale of their residence are exempt.
  • Individuals who finance an investment property/properties that they own may be subject to the rule.
  • Businesses who own and finance investment properties are more than likely subject to the rule.
  • Individuals and businesses who finance properties that they do not own are subject to the rule.
  • Individuals and businesses who accept a residential mortgage application are subject to the rule.

In other words, if you loan money to someone to buy a house, you might just become the next unpaid government spy. Congratulations.

What’s incredible is that FinCEN came up with this rule all on its own. There was no Constitutional legislative progress. Nothing was submitted for debate on the House floor, or for the President’s signature.

This is not a law. It’s simply a new policy that a federal agency decided to impose, in its sole discretion. And it happens every single day across the hundreds of federal agencies in Washington– a sort of ‘self-legislation’ which creates thousands of pages of new regulations that each and every American is obliged to obey.

Not exactly what the Founding Fathers had in mind…

In the case of FinCEN, the agency has conjured a rule creating (by their estimate) 31,000 new unpaid government spies. You might be one of them. And in the coming months, you can expect more rulings that will apply to other professions– real estate agents, pawn brokers, and just about anyone who deals in cash.

Have you reached your breaking point yet?

Get Fresh Updates and Build Your Freedom
Join 117,239+ subscribers and get the Notes from the Field newsletter with actionable information on how to build your freedom. Enter your email below to get started:
arrow 3 Introducing the governments newest unpaid spy: YOU

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • Nsp

    why, why are you ‘obliged to obey’ ?   there can be no obligation to injustice. Were American’s obligated to obey so called ‘laws’ pertaining to slavery in the antebellum south?  don’t be absurd, Simon.  These so called obligations are issued through coercion and threat of force.  naturally such ‘laws’ and/or policies have no inherent validity, just as any testimony given under duress (coercion or threat of force) is inadmissable and binding on NO ONE.  people need to wake up and realize that you don’t have to comply.

  • Anonymous

    The answer is self-preservation in the face of brute force. Your arguments sound good until the Feds come after you, seize your assets, force you into bankruptcy or prison as you struggle to defend yourself while teaching them about laws they already disrespect before judges who abandoned justice-oriented common law long ago.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/3YPO2B734EN2WTK5VX4YUZ2FFQ Sarah

    I’m sorry, but I’ve lived in Newark, and Cory Booker has been a fantastic mayor. This is not rural Wyoming — the guns he’s talking about are illegal weapons used by gangs in drive-by shootings and other crimes that lead to Newark having one of the highest murder rates in the country. Anything the city can do to get those guns off the street is good for the people of Newark.

  • http://twitter.com/Cowchin Michael Hunt

    Sarah, I am not trying to pick on you, just give you something to think about……

    How exactly do you intend to go about distinguishing an “illegal” gun from a “legal” one?
     

  • Krush

    And so the tyranny of what used to the U.S. government continues…

  • Ganymede50

    “…thousands of pages of new regulations that each and every American is obliged to obey.”

    Only those regulations which are substantive (see Chrysler
    v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979)) have the force and effect of law. For a regulation to be substantive, it must comply with requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (codified at Title 5 USC) and publishing requirements of the Federal Register Act. Very few, if any, regulations are substantive.

    • Anonymous

      That’s right… and yet, these regulations, without the force and effect of law, plague virtually all of us in substantive ways every day. But even if the ignorant wake up, few will find this a profitable hill to die on given the increasing costs and risks of challenging the regulators.

      • Gene

         Best just to take your business elsewhere…hence this website:-) No reason to stick around the US. Too many christian fanatics; too many people who don’t want to be free anymore. Not much upside to staying.

      • http://www.couches.info/ Nsp

        “But even if the ignorant wake up, few will find this a profitable hill to die on given the increasing costs and risks …”

        then they are still ignorant. those who are not, see and understand that to continue to ‘go along’ in the interest of self-preservation means that we are only heading further down a very dark road.  Remember the words of Orwell, and remember them well …

        “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stomping on a human face — forever.”yes, there are costs and risks. but if we continue to comply we do so at our own peril.  truth or consequences.  we are in this position today ONLY because we (each one of us) did not stand up yesterday and say, “today i am going to stand up for what is right”, regardless of the consequences

  • kiss off

    STAND UP and just say NO WAY. DON’T comply.

  • kiss off

    why post a response if they are pre screened.

  • Freedomlover1776

    Does anybody else out there recall that tense and tragic scene from the movie “The Sound of Music”  where the oldest daughter’s boyfriend, who had joined Hitler’s Youth, made the decision to blow his whistle on the Von Trapp family as they were trying to escape? In that decision moment he turned out to be a scumbag. How many of our friends, relatives, neighbors, co-workers, fellow church members, etc. will similarly become such?  Educate and
    pursuade folks to rise above this now, before it’s entirely too late!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/KFCRJRATVOIRSINNNOSHMDHA7U Tim

    A quota would encourage people to break the ninth commandment. If one must turn in five people a month and not one of them deserves it, you must bear false witness to fulfill the quota.

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/MarcusCMarcellus?feature=mhee She Was Kinda Hot

    I would feel sorry for people who believe in “American exceptionalism” if they weren’t so obnoxious and stupid. Anyone who cannot see where this country is headed deserves to live in it.

Next Post:

Previous Post:

Read more:
Paul Krugman is wrong
Close