Is it fixable?

Marco Polo

Reporting from: New York City

In the 15th century, the highest standard of living in the world belonged to China. Places like Nanjing had reached the pinnacle of civilization with incredibly modern infrastructure, robust economies, substantial international trade, great healthcare, and a rising middle class.

Across the globe, Europeans were living out short, mud-filled, brutish lives in squalid poverty, dying off by the thousands from the bubonic plague. They were practically Neanderthals compared to the Chinese, and explorers like Marco Polo wrote fanciful tales of wealth and opulence in the east.

If you had told a Chinese merchant at the time that, over the course of the next several hundred years, global primacy would shift to Europe (and a relatively unknown American continent), you would have been laughed at. It was simply unthinkable given how advanced China was over the west.

black deathbrueghel Is it fixable?

And yet, it happened. History shows us that the great things about western civilization (Industrial Revolution, technological achievement) and the not-so-great things about western civilization (imperialism, slavery, genocide) caused the tables to turn and primacy to shift from east to west.

Ironically, the tables are turning yet again, and its driven by a number of factors.

At the tail end of World War II, a new global financial system was concocted that was heavily biased to disproportionately benefit the United States. Over the subsequent decades, foreign countries would obligingly mop up US government largess and finance out of control retail consumption.

It got to the point where people felt it was a natural right of Americans to have huge homes, cheap gas, and oodles of junk, as well as a government that could buy anything it wanted without giving a second thought to fiscal discipline. Much of this was made possible at the expense of peasant workers overseas.

For years, they imported US inflation and suffered a tremendous disparity in standard of living, all because of how the global financial system was set up. This system, based on the United States as the center of the economic universe, is now completely fractured, and it’s the biggest game changer in centuries.

Is it possible that such a force can be stopped or reversed? Highly unlikely.

These huge sea changes in the global order happen slowly, like titanic ships changing course in a tight canal. The initial seeds of change were planted decades ago when the US began running consistent budget deficits in the early 1960s, and even before that when the Federal Reserve Act was passed in 1913 (which forever corrupted the nation’s money supply).

The negative momentum has been building for an exceptionally long time. Today’s debt, inflation, and unemployment crises are merely the latest symptoms of a cancer that has been growing for decades.

In total objectivity, the patient is beyond cure at this point… and the math is quite simple.

The US debt situation is already very precarious, and even the government’s own budget shows continued deficits for years and years to come. Undoubtedly, this represents some level of risk for the nation’s creditors, and market participants will require a greater return on investment in order to justify the risk of loaning money to the US government.

Even assuming that all existing debt is rolled into new bonds, higher borrowing costs will absolutely cripple the Treasury. The more money they borrow, the higher their borrowing costs will become; yet, the higher their borrowing costs become, the more money they’ll have to borrow to make interest payments.

Nations typically enter this vicious cycle once they start having to borrow money just to pay interest on what they already owe. The US is already way past this point.

If you study US financial conditions, you’ll see that mandatory entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare soak up over 75% of all federal tax revenue collected. That’s before paying a penny in interest on the debt. The rest of the budget constitutes several trillion dollars in other expenses like genital-groping TSA agents.

As such, given the current budget just for the sacrosanct areas like defense and senior benefits, tax revenue falls over $400 billion short. America has to borrow to pay its interest expense.

Is it possible for a white knight to come riding in and slash spending by the necessary (and brutal) 50%++ just to break even? Possible, but extremely unlikely without granting him/her dictatorial powers. Getting a majority of 435 members of Congress to sign up for such painful political consequences is dubious at best.

Even still, such cuts would just be enough to break even. In order to actually make progress on paying down the debt, one would have to make even steeper cuts… and that’s just at today’s levels. The debt grows worse by the day, as do useless ‘economic recovery’ spending measures.

As such, borrowing costs are set to rise, causing the budget deficit to spiral out of control towards an eventual default.

Since so much of the global financial system is based on the US treasury market, this will set off a chain reaction of bank defaults and commercial bankruptcies, not to mention trigger a wave of credit default swap and other derivative obligations to the tune of several trillion dollars.

The other (more likely) possibility is that the Federal Reserve will continue to finance the deficit by conjuring additional money supply out of thin air, eventually leading to a loss of confidence in the dollar as a reasonable store of value.

The only reason this hasn’t happened already is because there is no viable alternative yet, however there are clear signs that investors and foreign governments are scrambling for a quick solution. Smaller alternatives like the Swiss franc, Singapore dollar, and gold are all at record highs.

Barring a benevolent dictator or some kind of miracle, this situation is unstoppable and irreversible until the next cycle of the global pecking order turns the tables once again.

Tomorrow I’m going to discuss the social implications… but first, I’d like to hear from you about this– do you think the problems in the existing system are fixable without a complete reset in the way the world works?

Get Fresh Updates and Build Your Freedom
Join 117,239+ subscribers and get the Notes from the Field newsletter with actionable information on how to build your freedom. Enter your email below to get started:
arrow 3 Is it fixable?

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • Anonymous

    Most people didn’t know or want to believe that the most probable reason “they” killed JFK was because Kennedy wanted to expose the Federal Reserve System and to abolish them.
    The cesspool is so enormous that it will only contaminate any clear water at this point; therefore, revival is not possible.
    Do the math and plan your escape the ACT on it to the teeth until mission accomplished!

  • Anonymous

    … And I beheld, and lo a black horse; and he that sat
    on him had a pair of balances in his hand. And I heard a voice in the
    midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three
    measures of barley for a penny … . Revelation 6:5-6Eradicate the “creature” re-understand “individual liberty” and trash out the “takers” and defang the union bosses. It sounds simple doesn’t it?

  • Das300

    In my opinion there is no doubt an ECONOMIC  RESET by agreement or by WAR must happen . There must be a collapse because power will never give up what it has without it being forced from it’s hands.

    If you consider the following in terms of forces : Only forces shift conditions not opinions.
    A) External Forces
     : OIL -> re tooling in almost all areas must occur to run from new energy . They question is what energy ? OIL can sit in a barrel as stored energy and energy density is large . What can compete with this  to date .. nothing on the horizon . Therefore , what is required is a complete organnised research and re industrialisation.
     : Population growth – We simply cannot continue to expand at our current rate and consume as a western civilisation without complete rethink of how we do things.
     : Food supply : See above as they are closely linked
     : Climate – is a constant issue man made or not and requires constant monitoring of galaxy shifts , Earthly shifts  in order to assess humans response .The ability for nations to rebuild from national disasters without it sending the country back 50 years is needed.
     
    B) Underlying Financial Stability
     : Now consider the two recent strong currencies EURO and US are fracturing . The re emergence of GOLD after 200 years shows that nothing has really developed financially since basic times . A basic natural force of tangeable asset and value seems common amongst humanity .

    C) ” Those who have power or money ” are unwilling to give it up to those who have not or to others who have not . This is a force from the dawn of time . It is helping propel the current economy towards complete failure , an unstable , positive feedback system . 

    D) Rules can be changed : What is rule and legal now can become
    illegal and law tommorow . eg ) Early 1900′s Gold at some stages became illegal to hold , it can happen again if force determines it so.
    So rules can be changed to suite the POWERS at that time .

    E) Those who control brute force will use it : to their own means.  He who yields the biggest stick wins . In history the Empires always yielded their power to obtain favourable outcomes eg: USA post WWII , ENGLAND , Roman Empires are just a few . It is worth examining what countries control such power .

    F) Intelligence is coming : The arrival of super intelligent technologies that automate research and building machinery on a scale many times what we currently have.This will yield an ability to monitor society and enforce LAW far more efficiently than now . Liberties and basic freedoms will be eroded many levels /times from what we currently enjoy now .

    At the end of the day the primary indicator that counts will be C) What will the main powers do to protect themselves : not their people but themselves . Answer this and you answer what will happen as long as you keep a tab on the above forces mentioned .

    Some outcomes :
    a) Collapse Middle class and lower class destruction : will unravel in a far worse situation than previous times as CITIES struggle to maintain basic services .
    b) World War controlling assets of : Minerals and OIL and Food

    c) World government : watch Bill Clinton here haha .
    Formed from the victors of b) as per WWII re distribution of boundaries .
    d) One World Currency and LAW : for countries ( now less defined ) people to be granted access to services they must adhere to a common world law .

    Pending this :
    A world opperating far more efficiently : people will become monitored more efficiently more like PC’s on a network being efficiently used for data storing  processing .

    Please reply if improvements insights are seen :
    Thanks
    A reader of SIMON das300 at warmermail.com

  • Das300

    Hello,
    I would also like to add to the rules changing that there is potential for new ideas ..

    eg: Predicatbility allows us to build stable models . eg We realy on the sun heating up Earth creating a predicatble enough pattern in climate to grow crops  etc . when this is upset society potentially can suffer greatly.

    Economically we have situations where a person cannot place money  (currency ) in the BANKS because
    a) Is the BANK safe enough
    b) Inflation erodes the savings – standard of living 
    c) Is the currency safe enough

    These variables with others must be taken out of the equation in the new economy in order to develop a STABLE system that has infinite time  stability.

    Take for example b) and pensioners . When I think about that after 50 years of working a person is handed out a risky pot luck out come at a time when they are older and less able seems far from reasonable if we are talking about a “designed” economic system .

    Is this the best we can do for modern society ? Far from it , but we are now talking about having to ask questions about the basic human and trust of a fellow human and greed …

    In the end our own personality construction and make up are weaknesses  not our ability to design a decent economic system from scratch. We have demonstrated an ability to create very stable systems in all sorts of areas to help us live better . Economics seems to be inherited from our ancestors which includes fears and emotions .

    :-)

  • JB

    Fixable? Depends.  If the current administration is successfull in creating epidemic crisis, we will not have a 2012 election. We will have a continuing dictatorial “spread the wealth around” leadership, stiffling job growth to keep a majority of the voting public bowing down to those who feed them.  I expect large statures and pictures on sides of buildings depicting the “One”, pres hussein.  Gird your loins……

  • Tazwell Remu

    Right on man.  I apply this philosophy in all aspects of my life.  It is time to understand that one’s way of seeing things has made all the difference and that sight never was found in a crowd.  I challenge you in a friendly way to come forward with direction, ideas… from the heart of your inspiration.  Those of us in this somewhat solitary understanding are bringing in something great.  Best to you.

    • http://www.insuranceactivist.com Alan

      I was once an activist, over a related topic. As I studied that topic I realised much of the destruction and brain-dead policies were tied to a much larger picture. Ironically I took a very long and detailed path to discover socialism and how damaging it is.

      Further study has me now convinced that the state itself is and always has been the problem. Today I’m a full-blown libertarian.

      To my credit I founded an international organisation that became the largest of it’s kind, creating mutliple local chapters in 17 different countries. However I basically pushed existing members to a new organisation and retired upon moving abroad. I’ve no desire to be a political activist in a country that doesn’t suffer the same problems (as much) and where I have to renew my visa regularly…

      But yes, you can make a difference. Think big, take action but never play the state at it’s own game (violence)

      What Simon is doing is good; getting people to think and understand is most of the battle.

      But I speak from experience on the ‘don’t expect a crowd to do it for you’ thing. Likewise for every 100 people claiming they deffo will turn up for street protests, expect one (1) protester to actually arrive.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KIRZSBSOQWEIGNURVTKR37LIGQ GMiller

      Even tjhe Coloniosts were “wet toilet paper” for a long time before they had finally had enough and rebelled.

      That being said, the present day sheeple are putting up with worse outrages than the colonists ever  did. I believe that there are a few reasons for that:

      - The colonists were new or 1st or 2nd generation immigrants with moxie, who took risks to come here and build new lives and fortunes. Present day folks are far less adventurous.

      - Many present day sheeple have been brainwashed by a cenury of Progresive thinking, believe that others owe them a living. They have become too accustomed and comfortable with being dependent.

      - Present day government is far more effective in controlling the sheeple than the Britsih masters of the 18th century could ever hope to be.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KIRZSBSOQWEIGNURVTKR37LIGQ GMiller

      Even tjhe Coloniosts were “wet toilet paper” for a long time before they had finally had enough and rebelled.

      That being said, the present day sheeple are putting up with worse outrages than the colonists ever  did. I believe that there are a few reasons for that:

      - The colonists were new or 1st or 2nd generation immigrants with moxie, who took risks to come here and build new lives and fortunes. Present day folks are far less adventurous.

      - Many present day sheeple have been brainwashed by a cenury of Progresive thinking, believe that others owe them a living. They have become too accustomed and comfortable with being dependent.

      - Present day government is far more effective in controlling the sheeple than the Britsih masters of the 18th century could ever hope to be.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KIRZSBSOQWEIGNURVTKR37LIGQ GMiller

    a Socialist who believs in flying saucers?e

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KIRZSBSOQWEIGNURVTKR37LIGQ GMiller

    a Socialist who believs in flying saucers?e

  • Dragos2112

    This dog won’t hunt and those in power don’t float…
    There are many who are looking to stand our ground, stay here, and try to survive it all.
    The ‘paper’ adjustment for Greece might put out that fire temporarily, BUT, exactly what can be done for the US of A?
    IF those in power/ownership want to keep the squeeze going, then American debt will have to be forgiven.
    Automatic protectionism through attrition…we will be basically isolated from all imports.
    Without any manufacturing base and very few family farms, chaos will reign.
    1929 was a cake walk compared to what is coming-see above.
    No place to run to and nothing on the way there, will kill about half the population…
    The flight fantasies, before or after will simply kill…
    After an emergency, no food in the grocery, and electricity is needed to pump water and fuel…
    After all considerations, it would appear that the only option left is a military one…
    Army is ready and so are those ‘camps’.
    Stopped on a trip out west by a rail road that had several long lines of box cars just sitting there. They are equipped to haul people…
    If you can’t leave the country, get ready.
    Food, fuel, guns, and a place that is out of the way far enough that you won’t be noticed much…or have visitors, etc.
    The other problem no one talks about is the fact that there are no reserves of any intrinsic value that can be used as a currency.
    It is all gone.
    IF waited out, We The People might have an extremely small chance to start over.
    I see too much of the whole of it all, way past tipping points, etc.
    Expect emergency declarations, suddenly from all over; first financials, governments, and then military.
    ‘They’ will expect obedience to the dictates or forfeit you.
    Due to the armed levels, America has the best survival expectancy.
    World government will be attempted, but probably fail (various reasons). No body gets along that well, etc.
    Going to be a far out ride for sure.    

  • thistlebyd

    No, I do not.

  • befree

    I think a reset is inevitable. Do you think the bitcoin will gain long term user traction?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000999604578 Vanowen-Whitsett Lawr

    Since there are so many threats and ailments afflicting the western world today, exactly HOW we are going to down and when, who and where is all up for debate and a crystal ball however its OBVIOUS as the editor pointed out, that there are SO MANY factors against us and the global money situation the western world is in is pretty mathematically impossible to ultimately escape. If the politicians do everything JUST RIGHT and perfect, we would ease slowly into a low but still appreciable standard of living instead of being the superpower of the 20th century. But more likely, the powers that be will NOT get it right, its like trying to defuse the most complicated financial bomb ever and somewhere somethings just going to blow and when it does, the cascading shockwave will take everyone by surprise. Everyone of course except people like me who major in mathematics.

  • J J Taylor

    I know of nothing that cannot be broken beyond the point of any possibility of repair. Welcome fellow travelers.

  • Michael Vega

    USA Declares Force Majeure as a  way to blame it all on a act of God beyond their devilish control, Just one more way to pass the buck.

  • Peter Norton

    The system itself is totally broken.  Politicians, by nature, will *always* make the wrong choices simply because being reelected is the primary goal, *not* “doing the right thing”.  ”Power tends to corrupt.  And absolute power corrupts absolutely” said Lord Acton, back in 1887.  Obviously a very forward looking fellow…or superb historian.  I can’t think or speak of any of them as “leaders” as I’d not trust any of them to “lead” me across a busy street. What a colossal ego it takes to announce they anyone has the answers for ALL.

  • Don

    More outstanding insights from someone who has a demonstrated, well thought out, firm grasp and realistic view of the bigger picture.  I can’t say enough about the education I have received from Simon Black’s commentaries and writings.  A service to the world but a lifeline to those living in the U.S.

  • Maritima

    While I read the following article, I don’t agree with everything. Food for thought.

    Turning the Muslim Bus Around

    Turning
    the Muslim Bus Around

    By Paul Hollrah (Colony
    Rabble) on June 2nd, 2011

    The January 2011 edition of National Geographic Magazine contains a
    cover story by Robert Kunzig, titled, “Population 7 Billion.”  If it is
    not enough to scare the pants off anyone concerned about the future of mankind,
    it should at least be enough to make us do some serious thinking.  For
    example, what do we see as the long term future of the country where our
    children and grandchildren, and their children and grandchildren, will have to
    live long after we are gone?

    The article begins by describing how, in 1677, Dutchman Antoni van
    Leeuwenhoek attempted to estimate the population of the Earth.  Since there
    were no reliable censuses, van Leeuwenhoek assumed that the Earth was as
    densely populated as Holland.  And since the population of Holland was
    estimated to be about 1 million people, and the inhabitable land mass of the
    Earth was estimated to be some 13,385 times the size of Holland (the correct
    figure is close to 3,300 times the size of Holland), he concluded that there
    were some 13.4 billion people on Earth.

    Actually, he overestimated a bit.  Anthropologists now estimate that,
    in 1677, the population of the Earth was only about 500 million.  As
    Kunzig describes the post-1677 population growth,

    “A century and a half later… the world’s population had doubled to more than
    a billion.  A century after that, around 1930, it had doubled again to two
    billion.  Before the 20th century, no human had lived through a
    doubling of the human population, but there are people alive today who have
    seen it triple.  Sometime in late 2011, according to the UN Population
    Division, there will be seven billion of us.”  UN demographers project
    world population at nine billion by 2045.

    Kunzig tells us that, “Close to a billion people go hungry each day,” and
    that, “Decades from now, there will likely be two billion more mouths to feed,
    mostly in poor countries…”  Paul Ehrlich, author of The Population
    Bomb, predicted in 1970 that “hundreds of millions of people are going to
    starve to death,” and that it was far too late to do anything about it. 
    Making the point that the very future of the United States was at stake, he
    said, “The cancer of population growth… must be cut out, by compulsion if
    voluntary methods fail.”

    What has surprised demographers is how far and how fast fertility rates have
    fallen in some areas of the world.  Kunzig points out that, “China,
    home to a fifth of the world’s people, is already below replacement fertility
    and has been for nearly 20 years, thanks in part to the coercive one-child
    policy implemented in 1979; Chinese women who were bearing an average of six
    children each as recently as 1965, are now having 1.5…”  But there is
    another very ominous side to the story.  Kunzig tells us that in some
    parts of the world, occupied by just 16 percent of the world population, there
    is still a problem of high fertility… mostly in sub-Saharan Africa where
    fertility rates average five children per woman.

    Compared to fertility rates in most western nations… 2.1 children per woman
    in the United States, 1.9 in New Zealand, 1.5 in Canada, 1.3 in Germany and
    Austria, 1.2 in Russia and Italy, and 1.1 in Spain… it is worrisome to compare
    birthrates in those countries with the fertility rate in some Muslims
    countries: Niger 7.46, Mali 7.42, Somalia 6.76, Afghanistan 6.69, and Yemen
    6.58.  As those countries continue to overpopulate and their people become
    poorer and hungrier, they tend to want to emigrate to Europe and to the United
    States where, more and more, they are making up the shortfall in the population
    replacement rate.

    Joseph D’Agostino of the Population
    Research Institute states the obvious.  He says, “For the most part,
    only Muslims have high birth rates…”  And since Christians and Jews are no
    longer having large families, “Muslims are going to inherit the Earth.” 
    He warns that the world will be a far different place if Muslims become the
    dominant religious group.  He says, “I think we can see what life is like
    in Islamic countries… And we can see that the Muslim world is becoming actually
    more radical and, in many ways, is headed backwards into its barbaric phase…”

    In some European countries Muslims have already begun to overwhelm existing
    cultures.  They are imposing Sharia Law on old Europe at a rapid pace and,
    unless the people of Western Europe wake up and turn things around, within a
    generation or two the Europe we know and love will be gone forever. 
    Unlike other cultures, Muslims do not assimilate.  To the contrary, their
    goal is to overwhelm the culture of their host countries.  We’ve
    seen this in the installation of foot baths at airports, Muslim cab drivers
    refusing to transport passengers with alcohol in their luggage, Muslim clerks
    refusing to ring up alcohol at department store cash registers, etc., etc.

    Again, what we must all decide, before it’s too late, is what sort of
    country we want to leave to our children and grandchildren… assuming, of
    course, that we care enough that we would want to leave them a nation with a
    western-style culture that bears no resemblance to the barbaric 7th
    and 8th century cultures that dominate the Muslim world in the 21st
    century.

    Americans have always taken pride in the fact that we were an ethnic
    “melting pot.”  But that characterization ceased to be a source of pride
    when immigration quotas favoring Europeans were abandoned in 1965.  The
    catalyst for that demographic disaster was Senator Ted Kennedy’s Immigration
    and Nationality Act.  Since implementation of the Kennedy bill the United
    States has experienced a flood of immigrants from Latin America and Asia.
     What he and other liberals failed to understand is that we had a perfectly
    fine country before they came along and that the vast majority of us would have
    preferred it to stay just as it was.

    What Western nations must ultimately conclude is that Islam is not a
    “religion” as we in the west understand the term.  Vested with full 1st
    Amendment rights, it is far more than that; it is a social, political, legal,
    military, and economic system with a spiritual component.  It is an evil
    force that attempts to impose its seventh century value system in any way
    possible, violent or non-violent, on an enlightened twenty-first century
    world.  Without its religious component, Islam would be viewed as just
    another hate group, outlawed in every country outside the Islamic world.
     Of all of the major religious denominations, it is only Muslims who
    proselytize by giving reluctant converts a choice they cannot refuse: either
    swear allegiance to the Prophet Mohammed, or die.

    Some Western European nations are already beginning to push back. 
    Several European leaders have declared multiculturalism a failure.  France
    has enacted a law barring Muslim women from wearing the burka in public and
    Germany and Holland are considering similar laws.  But much more needs to
    be done.

    Like most Europeans of the post-World War II era, many Americans have
    succumbed to the fiction that Islam is a “religion of peace” and that worldwide
    jihad is merely a pipedream of the radical few.  The litmus test for Islam
    as a “religion of peace” will be the day when churches and synagogues can be
    built throughout the Muslim world and when Christians, Jews, and other
    non-Muslims can practice their religious beliefs openly and freely in all
    Muslim countries… and not before.  Since many mosques are known to be
    breeding grounds for jihadist murderers, Muslims should be prohibited from
    building mosques anywhere in the West.

    Islam must be viewed, not as the world’s second largest religious
    denomination, but as an invasive alien culture that has not evolved appreciably
    beyond its 7th century roots.

    If Islam cannot be banned from our shores on the basis that it is far more
    than just another religious sect seeking religious freedom… that it is, in
    fact, an invading force that occupies and holds territory by terrorizing and
    out-populating the indigenous peoples… then T.B Macaulay was right when, in
    1859, he characterized the U.S. Constitution as being “all sail and no
    anchor.”  Instead, we must acknowledge that our Constitution invites such
    liberalization of 1st Amendment principles as to be a
    self-destructing instrument.  If it does not allow us to protect ourselves
    from a religious sect that seeks not religious freedom, but social and
    political dominion through violent means, then it will not allow us to protect
    ourselves from the drunken savagery of a rampaging motorcycle gang.  It’s
    all a matter of scale.

    Kunzig’s study leaves us with just two options.  If we do not want to
    see our major cities devolve into nightmarish Muslim hellholes such as Kabul,
    Baghdad, or worse, Mogadishu, we can; a) do nothing, insuring that the U.S will
    become just another Islamic cesspool, our women brutalized and disenfranchised,
    or b) we can maintain the current size and ethnicity of the U.S. population by
    repealing the Immigration and Nationality Act, returning to pre-Kennedy
    immigration quotas, giving preference to the wealthiest, best educated, and
    most productive people of Europe, South America, and the Far East, and reducing
    or eliminating our dependence on Arab oil.  That must be our goal and we
    must not shrink from embracing it openly and publicly.                              

    Caroline Glick writes in Jewish World Review that, since taking office,
    Barack Obama has “failed to conceive of a strategy for contending with the
    situation.”  Instead, he has discouraged any discussion of the basic
    threat posed by radical Islam by banning the use of the terms “War on Terror,”
    “jihad,” “Islamic terrorism,” and “Radical Islam” in U.S. government documents.

    As one Muslim caller to a radio talk show put it, “The liberal
    (peace-loving) Muslims are on the bus… but the crazies are driving the
    bus.”  If that is the same bus on which Obama has invited Republicans to
    ride… so long as we sit in the back… then I want no part of it.  It’s time
    to get all of the good people off the bus, turn it around, put Obama behind the
    wheel, and send him and all of his Muslim friends back to where they came
    from.  Call me islamophobic if you will, but if peace-loving Muslims are
    incapable of controlling their radicalized brethren and assimilating in our
    culture, then I just don’t want them in my country.

     

     

    http://www.redcounty.com/content/turning-muslim-bus-around

  • John

    This problem will not be fixed because the people in charge of fixing the problem are the problem.  The biggest entitlements in the United States are all branches of the government collecting huge revenues in taxes.  If it wasn’t for the government the economy would be thriving.  Oh, I have a new idea, why don’t we try the Free Enterprise  System?! It sure isn’t what we have now.  For everyone who thinks everything is going well, imagine if the millions of people who get welfare, food stamps, section 8, were cut off.  The money they are getting is being printed out of thin air.  If they were cut off you would quickly see how bad the economy really is. 
         The problem in this country is the people have far too much respect and trust for the clowns in the government who are ruining our economy.  Our government officials are our employees, we are not their subjects.  Since our government is corrupt and taking us to the cleaners we should follow the law at our own discretion and do everything we need to to survive and go back to the barter system.

    • Achanz

      The “Creature” commissioned Congress (the fox) to build the
      hen-house and for them to install the security system.

  • Jack

    You know, I think a lot of people like you are not helping the way you should be. If you were not making any money off of this negative thining would you still be doing it?? If you answer yes then you are really not helping. You have made enuff off of our backs and the fear mongering you are passing along!!! If you were serious about this you and the other wizards of gloom and doom would team up, quit scaring the shit out of us (to get us to buy something) and combine your efforts in a way that would help!! Yes we as a Nation are in trouble, we need to help each other without cost. That is what humans are supposed to do as taught in all our basic philosophies ( Judaism, Christian, Muslim, Buddhism, etc, etc). Not make a profit out of as you do!!!!

  • John Braintree

    It is not a mystery why Europe was a basket case in the 15th century.  Such paralysis was due to 12 hundred years of papal rule over church and state.  As one writer noted:

    “The noontide of the papacy was the world’s moral midnight. The Holy Scriptures were almost unknown, not only to the people, but
    to the priests. Like the Pharisees of old, the papist leaders hated the light which would reveal their sins. God’s law, the standard of righteousness, having been removed, they exercised power without limit, and practiced vice without restraint. Fraud, avarice, and profligacy prevailed. Men shrank from no crime by which they could gain wealth or position. The palaces of popes and prelates were scenes of the vilest debauchery. Some of the reigning pontiffs were guilty of crimes so revolting that secular rulers endeavored to depose these dignitaries of the church as monsters too vile to be tolerated. For centuries Europe had made no progress in learning, arts, or civilization. A moral and intellectual paralysis had fallen upon Christendom.”

    But the rise of Protestantism changed all this.  Fast forward to the New World in the early 1700′s:

    “The Bible was held as the foundation of faith, the source of wisdom, and the charter of liberty. Its principles were diligently
    taught in the home, in the school, and in the church, and its fruits were manifest in thrift, intelligence, purity, and temperance. One might be for years a dweller in the Puritan settlements, and not “see a drunkard, nor hear an oath, nor meet a beggar.” It was demonstrated that the principles of the Bible are the surest safeguards of national greatness. The feeble and isolated colonies grew to a confederation of powerful States, and the world marked with wonder the peace and prosperity of ‘a church without a pope, and a State without a king.’ ”

    But the United States, which led the world from despotism and theocratic tyranny to liberty of conscience, is now leading the world back to tyranny.  The present and previous president, the first in American history, have both personally bowed to the pope and George Bush declared that “Catholic principles must be put into practice here in America.”  Five of the nine Supreme Court justices are now Roman Catholic. The United States is now sacrificing the secret of its prosperity, protestantism and republicanism, and right on cue, our economic might is deteriorating right before our eyes and we are on the brink of economic ruin, a far cry from our economic predominance at the end of World War II when American protestants howled that Truman dared to think of sending an ambassador to the Vatican.

    The United States, under Rome’s increasing influence is repudiating its Constitution and a continued decline in temporal prosperity will be the sure result just as in the 1500′s.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NL23BXH46Y7W2D7FBJOUOP4MQM philross

    Seems too late to correct our debt problem. Let us suffer in our stupidity, maybe we and our government might learn to do what is right. Just to stop spending is not the answer.

  • Antal Fekete

    I am professor Antal E. Fekete. I have a website http://www.professorfekete.com . “Fekete” means “black” in Hungarian. This is not an alias, I was born with this name. I am impressed with your description of 15th century China and her highest standard of living at the time. China had been on the silver standard since time immemorial. One of the great questions of human civilization is whether the silver standard died a natural death, or it was the victim of euthanasia. It is possible that the phoenix-like rise of China in the 21st century heralds the phoenix-like rise of silver and the restoration of the dual monetary system based on gold and silver, as the regime of irredeemable currency that was foisted upon the world by the U.S. in 1971 is coming to an ignominious close.

    The demonetization of silver by the United States is referred to by some as “the crime of 1873″. It was strewn with chicanery and coercion. Chicanery, because Congress stooped to abolishing a Constitutional right, the free coinage of silver, withour even proposing a Constitutional amendment. Coercion, because the measure was put through to humiliate and to weaken China further, already humiliated and weakened by the opium wars. 

    The opium wars were not about opium. They were about silver. Western countries had been losing silver to China through their one-way trade. They had to pay for their imports from China, but
    couldn’t offer anything the Chinese would want in exchange — until they hit upon opium. When China outlawed the opium trade, the Western countries, in one of the more shameful incidents of the  history history of the Western countries, declared war on China in the name of “free trade”. China was the loser in the opium wars, but the silver saga continued. In 1934 Roosevelt started his silver purchases in the world market that created a devastating deflation in China destabilizing the country, forcing it off the silver standard in 1935, and making it an easy prey of Japanese imperialism, and of Maoism in 1949.

    The high-handed dealing with the Constitution having a precedent, ”the crime of 1973″ followed that of 1873 when Nixon put an end to the last vestiges of metallic monetary standards in the U.S. through an executive order. Forty years later the U.S. is facing a total credit collapse.

    • Achanz

      Thank you Professor Fekete… I wish you can elaborate more on the opium Sega to clear the mist of the movie “55 days in Peking” staring Charleston Heston. 

  • Achanz

    That’s funny Charlie but the hole you mentioned is not an ordinary hole my friend. It is a broken drainpipe! You can cut all expenditures completely but the basin will still leak out of control! Now… who do you think broke the drainpipe and catching the water at the other end?

Next Post:

Previous Post:

Read more:
Boots on the ground in Egypt: trading one dictator for another
Close