≡ Menu

Five reasons to think twice before buying Facebook stock


May 18, 2012
Undisclosed location, USA

When you think about it, it’s easy to understand why financial markets and media have been so fixated on the Facebook IPO.

The creation of so many billionaires and millionaires overnight is certainly cause for good cheer, and given the debacle in Europe coupled with America’s looming ‘fiscal cliff’, Facebook may be the ONLY bit of good news in the entire financial system.

But a $100 billion valuation…? 100+ times earnings? This certainly seems excessive, at least for now.

What we’re supposed to believe about Facebook is that the company is going to continue to revolutionize advertising in the way that it stratifies users by demographic, geography, interests, etc.

True, this is really beneficial for advertisers; if you’re a company that manufactures surfboards, for example, you can target your ads to men between the ages of 20 and 30 who live in coastal California and “like” surfing or Laird Hamilton.

This is much more effective than some radio ad or billboard which is seen by the general public, 90% of which will not be the target market.

But there are a few issues with Facebook’s model-

1) Ad space is limited.

Like real estate along the highway for billboards, there is only so much digital real estate on a user’s screen that can be allocated for advertising space.

Once Facebook sells this space, it’s gone and cannot be resold. In order for Facebook to sell more ad space, the user needs to refresh his/her screen by clicking on a link.

Each time this happens, there is new screen real estate available for ad space, and Facebook can generate more revenue.

Ultimately, this means that Facebook’s ad space, hence the company’s revenue, is directly proportional to the aggregate number of page views, i.e. how many times all Facebook users load a new page and new advertisements are displayed.

Aggregate page views are tied to the number of Facebook users… as well as how much time they spend actively engaged on the site.

Given that such a meaningful percentage of the entire world population already uses Facebook, it’s difficult to expect rapid growth to the user base which would justify a 100x valuation on earnings.

2) Future growth markets are presently not that rich.

The preponderance of Facebook users are in developed markets like the US and Western Europe– places where consumers are wealthy enough to provide retailers with a solid return on their advertising investment.

But future Facebook markets are in developing countries; if you look at the visualization below (granted, it’s 18-months old), there’s a huge gaping hole in Africa. Not exactly most retail advertisers’ wet dream.

Does the growth potential of Facebook users in Africa and other developing markets justify a 100x valuation? Probably not.

3) China.

Another huge gaping hole for Facebook is China, which currently blocks the social network. China has its own assortment of closely-monitored social networks, though there are a number of Chinese who do use Facebook surreptitiously through proxy servers.

It would certainly be a questionable growth strategy to rely on the Chinese government to do anything for Facebook… but even if the company could gain entry to the Chinese market, double its user base, and double its revenue, it would still be selling for over 50x earnings. This is still really pricey.

4) The existing platform is riddled with errors.

I left Chile 62-hours ago for the United States. And yet, on my own Facebook homepage, I’m still being served Spanish language Chilean ads. Facebook seems to think I’m still in Chile.

This happens a lot as I travel; when I was in Asia and returned to Chile last month, I was receiving Singapore advertisements for at least a week afterwards.

This is a huge bug, indicative that Facebook’s existing ad platform is just not ready for prime time… and certainly not worth $100 billion.

5) Competition exists, big and small.

There is no shortage of competing social networks out there, from Four Square (20 million users) to Google’s Google+ (gaining by the day). Competition is something that any business has to deal with, but it will be hard to justify a 100x, $100 billion valuation if competitors are taking away market share from Facebook.

So if $100 billion, 100x earnings is too expensive, what’s a more reasonable valuation?

Take a look at Apple… a great company with great products and a ridiculously loyal customer base. Apple has made tens of billions of dollars selling its products to hundreds of millions of customers around the world.

Moreover, the iTunes store has sold over 16 billion songs, videos, and movies since inception just a few years ago.

Like Facebook, the numbers are staggering. Like Facebook, there is significant growth potential for Apple to sell its products in developing markets. And yet Apple’s stock sells for less than 15x earnings.

Google, another company that knows a little something about advertising, also shares similar growth potential… yet it trades at less than 20x earnings.

Bottom line, it’s pretty extraordinary that a bunch of young kids were able to create such a massive enterprise out of their dorm room in less than a decade. But definitely think twice before plunking down your hard-earned savings.

Our goal is simple: To help you achieve personal liberty and financial prosperity no matter what happens.

If you liked this post, please click the box below. You can watch a compelling video you’ll find very interesting.

Will you be prepared when everything we take for granted changes overnight?

Just think about this for a couple of minutes. What if the U.S. Dollar wasn’t the world’s reserve currency? Ponder that… what if…

Empires Rise, they peak, they decline, they collapse, this is the cycle of history.

This historical pattern has formed and is already underway in many parts of the world, including the United States.

Don’t be one of the millions of people who gets their savings, retirement, and investments wiped out.

Click the button below to watch the video.

About the author: Simon Black is an international investor, entrepreneur, permanent traveler, free man, and founder of Sovereign Man. His free daily e-letter and crash course is about using the experiences from his life and travels to help you achieve more freedom.

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • ATXObserver

    Right on.

  • http://www.facebook.com/PrinceDraxx Kerry Leavins

    What they and you have not mentioned is the fact that many users never see those adds at all. Firefox and Chrome both have ad blocking programs that kill targeted advertising so those users (I’m guessing about 20% or more) never see those highly touted targeted advertisements.

    • http://blademccool.myopenid.com/ BladeMcCool

      thank goodness for adblock plus. it is a great addon. also, i can imagine someone will make a site that just gets you your facebook feeds, but without the facebook. lol that would be funny. maybe it can pull your g+ and myspace shit all into one place too. that’d be kind of cool actually.

  • Yves1

    I believe that the fact that the FBI is requesting the right to have a back door will prevent a lot of people using Facebook.

  • http://twitter.com/Sonophoto Brig Young

    @Kerry: facebook advertises? I mean I know I have seen them advertising on TV…

    • http://www.facebook.com/PrinceDraxx Kerry Leavins

      Not facebook advertisements. Advertisements that facebook sells space for. Ad Block Plus Popup Blocker works great on Firefox and Ad Block Plus for Chrome and an additional add-on for Chrome keeps Google from tracking you as well.

  • http://twitter.com/madg1976 Marcos Duran

    1. Many before Facebook have found very clever ways to add ads to limited space. Sometimes quietly, sometimes very visibly. Google has been restrained and they so far use very little space… they are profitable. Facebook can redesign their service however they want and stick ads anywhere in your timeline. As long as they don’t go over the top like Myspace did they should be ok. Considering television has limited ad space as well, and newspapers, etc, the argument is almost moronic. 2. This is the same case for every other company in the world. It’s good that they are not rich, emerging markets have huge upside potential. 3. Facebook is not in China because it has refused to play by Chinese rules, like Google decided to do. Ball is in FBs court. 4. Yes. A glitch while traveling and moving amongst IP addresses and DNS servers is Facebook’s fault. This whole comment shows how ignorant he/she is about how the Internet works. 5. Google+? Really? The whole reason for being of + is Google shitting it’s pants about FB having better targeted ads. Facebook could integrate search as a fuck you back. Sovereign man needs to go back to school. 

    • Jpjordan

      you need to go back to school. You havent done anything but strengthen the writers perspective? If the same goes for every company in the world (about ad space)you just gave unlimited credibility to Soveriegn mans perspective on Ad space. Seems like you didnt go to school

    • bkh

      The key point is that the p/e ratio is ridiculously high – facebook is priced for perfection. It would have to become Google just to meet the valuation before you even think about making a decent return even on a long term investment in shares in the company.

    • http://www.facebook.com/PrinceDraxx Kerry Leavins

       There is also an add-on for Firefox and Chrome that kills the timeline on your computer. Unfortunately it does not yet work to blank it out on others computers, too. Only a matter of time, I’d guess.

  • http://blademccool.myopenid.com/ BladeMcCool

    What is the best way to short facebook? Is there a way I can buy facebook short positions with my Bitcoin holdings? (disclosure: I may or may not control any bitcoins).

  • http://twitter.com/MarkDGeorge Mark George

    A point you missed is that a few thorough studies have revealed that dispaly advertising on Facebook performs much worse than it does on other web properties. And Facebook won’t reveal click through rates, very telling that they are hiding the one somewhat meaningful metric from advertisers and investors.

  • http://spatech.edu/ Kris

    As an ex advertiser I can tell you, people click on the display ads even less than they do on regular websites. The concept is good but the main ads that matter are what comes up when someone asks a question, not when they are browsing their feed to see what their friends are up to. That is the biggest flaw of all. People are clicking on the ads but very, very few actually convert.

Read previous post:
Travel South America
Regardless of what the propaganda says, this is not how a free society treats people

May 17, 2012 Undisclosed Location, United States I've been in the US for a little more than 24-hours. And having...