How to make an extra $12,422,575.54

by Simon Black · 8 comments

January 12, 2010
Estepona, Spain

There is really a great deal of information out there about offshore corporate structures… frankly it’s mind numbing. Do a search for “offshore corporation” and you will undoubtedly return over a million websites promising you fast incorporation in Panama or the BVI, as well as a host of ‘benefits’ for that particular jurisdiction.

Are these benefits real? Does it make sense to structure a business overseas?

Yes. Planting a flag overseas provides asset protection benefits, and in many cases, significant tax benefits… even if you are a US citizen. It is possible, for example, to generate corporate profits free of tax liability, and to defer personal income tax liability indefinitely.

Let me first back up for a moment and explain some of the lovely US regulations that govern foreign corporations for US taxpayers. (as an aside, you should realize that I am not a tax attorney, nor does this constitute tax advice)

The first is section 957 of the Internal Revenue Code pertaining to “Controlled Foreign Corporations (CFC)”. A CFC is any foreign registered company with more than 50% direct or indirect ownership by a US person.

If a company is deemed to be a CFC, the IRS essentially views it as a domestic US company and expects the foreign company to file a tax return every year.

That’s where places like Panama come in. Some people try to get slick and form a Panamanian company, hiding behind their lawyers as nominee directors. If their name is withheld from a public registry, the US government will never know about their ownership interest… right?

Guess again. Basing your tax strategy around another human being keeping your secrets in just plain absurd. Your lawyer may be a good guy, but when push comes to shove and the US government comes knocking, he’ll sing like a canary.

Let me underscore this point again even more clearly– do NOT expect to hide profits through an offshore company without the government finding out. They will find out. Privacy and secrecy are gone, at least for now.

Fortunately, there’s a big fat silver lining. Most people do not realize that there are perfectly legitimate ways to structure your business interests overseas and realize significant benefit.

Big businesses do this all the time; large multinationals have subsidiaries and affiliate offices all over the world. Consider Boston Scientific, which manufactures products in Ireland and then ‘sells’ them around the world. The company only pays a 12.5% tax to Ireland on its profits from those sales, rather than 30% to the IRS.

You might be thinking to yourself right now– “Great… except I don’t plan on opening a multi-million dollar medical device manufacturing facility in Ireland.” Believe it or not, in many ways it’s even easier for some small businesses to capitalize on this concept, especially if you have an online presence. Here’s why:

A foreign corporation is subject to US income tax, depending on the situation, if any of the following are true–

First, if the foreign company has a permanent establishment in the United States; ‘permanent establishment’ is ordinarily defined by specific tax treaties, but usually includes things like an office, factory, or workshop.

Second, if the foreign company is engaged in a “US trade or business” or has US-source income; income source rules are defined by Internal Revenue Code section 862.

For example, if a business produces inventory, the source of income is where the inventory is produced; if a business performs personal service, the source is where the services were performed. For businesses that sell inventory, the source of income is where the products are sold.

As you can see, these rules clearly favor many types of enterprises, including e-commerce businesses, some service providers, overseas manufacturers, and businesses owned by expatriates.

Foreign corporations that fit these circumstances are not subject to paying US taxes. The company may be subject to tax in its own jurisdiction, but many (BVI, Cayman Islands, Labuan, Singapore, etc.) do not tax corporations on income earned outside of their borders.

In this manner, the corporate entity is free of tax liability. However, when the corporation makes dividend distributions to its owners (US taxpayers), the US citizen will pay tax on those distributions.

Presently, the dividend tax rate is quite low, but you can be sure that the Obama administration will raise the dividend tax in the future. If the corporation does not distribute profits to the owners, however, the individual has no immediate tax payment due and effectively defers his tax liability indefinitely.

Here’s an example– you are a US citizen and own an e-commerce company based in BVI. You have no permanent establishment in the US and have no US-source income by the IRS rules. The company does not pay tax to the US, nor does it pay tax to BVI.

Assume your company nets $1 million annually. You do NOT distribute this income, and rather invest all of your profits with a 20% annual return. At the end of 10-years, your business has accumulated $25.958 million.

Now assume the same business is structured in the US paying 30% to the government. At the end of 10-years, the business will have accumulated $13.536 million.

The compounding power of tax-deferred profits is extraordinary– you make an extra $12,422,575.54 with a properly structured foreign company.

This week I’m going to be interviewing one of the country’s premier international tax attorneys who specializes in offshore business structures. As a personal favor to me, he has agreed to walk you through the regulations and explain how you might be able to realize these benefits.

Want More Information Like This?
Sign up below for the free newsletter Sovereign Man: Notes From The Field to get more information like the article you just read, plus exclusive information that is not posted publicly.


  • Marquelle

    And I thought corporate tax rates in my home jurisdiction (2.5% BC provincial rate + 11% Canadian federal rate) were “low”…well, by Canadian standard they are!

  • NYSpursFan

    “You have no permanent establishment in the US and have no US-source income by the IRS rules.”

    You’re going to have to clarify this. Do you mean permanent personal domicile or business domicile? In other words, is this possible if I live in the US permanently? I suspect not.

  • Ed

    Many thanks for this Simon. It would be very useful if you could ask the tax attorney whether the UK tax laws are any worse or those compared to the US. I want to establish my business offshore but the UK tax office takes a similar view that if I am running the business from the UK the business is liable for tax in the UK. I have tried to find out but I can’t get a straight answer from offshore providers whether I can leave profits offshore without any UK tax liability.

  • Joe

    Great info Simon..That’s exactly what I am currently trying to setup, several offshore e business companies. So as long the company does not pay the owners there are not tax consequences, but I assume the offshore company can pay for all the owners expenses…is that correct?

  • Jana

    Simon et al…
    I am currently looking for an entrepreneurial licensee for an international business. I have two similar but different products, one for yoga/exercise and one for sex/tantra. Internationally they are both unlimited in scope and profit. The products are for social engineering the human species to the next stage of development (away from a 3rd world war) using sex energy to awaken kundalini/consciousness.

    • http://rauschenbach.us Möpsi

      Jana, I wonder if you have watched Reifenstahl’s “Triumph of the Will”? In chapter 16 (1hr 32-35 mins), Makevejev claims the Nazi goose stepping parade resulted from sexual deprivation, and in chapter 12 (36-38 mins), he claims that politics attracts those whose orgasms are defective, which in turn leads to revolution and fascism (war). There is also a sex appeal connection between Hitler, Stalin, and the newer American face. So, although what you are saying sounds fringe, I think you are probably onto something, since I am hearing this from other quarters, from people who have been thinking about it real hard for the last 50 years, ever since fascism screwed up their life, by killing all their friends and destroying their homes and homeland.

      But, social engineering is different than social enlightenment. One is by force, against the free will, and we do not need any more of that. Laura Knight-Jadczyk’s The Wave series would be a good read. Helping others against their will is no help at all, and just more meddling, which is the current trajectory, which is net negative.

      Producing positive sex tapes is a good thing. The abysmally low quality of material out there right now (say, in any one of Europe’s “finest hotels”) is one of the ways I judge that global society must be at a low point (Days of Noah, in other words). 75% of women agree with me, according to Glenn Beck’s new book. Anyone focusing on quality should be well aligned with the next 50 years of the cycle.

    • http://rauschenbach.us Möpsi

      Jana, you might want to contact my sister, who also produces a video series for social enlightenment: http://www.thelittletravelers.com/. She takes her kids to some part of the world, and shows the place through the eyes of children. So, if some evil empire whispers that they want to nuke Iran, for example, she goes there and films the teenagers skiing the slopes of Tehran, and films her kids playing with other lovable kids and mothers in their homes, parks, and shopping malls. Her approach gives a social anthropologist’s inside look at a place for the prospective tourist, while at the same time dissolves the fear propaganda. Criminally insane people drop bombs on moms & kids anyways, as we all know, but at least we can start to identify the problem.

  • Elai

    Canada has something similar to CDC where if the higher business functions (active board members are resident in Canada and/or have board meetings in Canada, offices are there, etc.) then it’s a Canadian resident Corp and taxed at Canadian Corp rates unless your Corp is registered in a place that has a tax treaty. Canadian citizens not resident in Canada do not count as resident board members. Barbados with a low (approx %3) tax rate is one of them an is on the OECD ‘white list’. You can look at revenue canada’s website for more information.

Previous post:

Next post: