Some things you haven’t heard about Dubai’s crisis

by Simon Black · 3 comments

The ticking time bomb in Dubai finally exploded late last week.

On the eve of their most important Muslim holiday, which happened to coincide with the eve of Thanksgiving in the west, Dubai authorities made two statements spaced a few hours apart.

The first– that the heavily indebted, government-owned flagship holding company Dubai World had successfully raised a few billion dollars.  Investors collectively exhaled, temporarily relieved that the company would be able to make good on its colossal debt payments.

The second statement came only hours later: Dubai World announced that it was asking creditors for a standstill on its outstanding debt… in other words, everything freezes– no more payments.

It’s a real life example of the adage, “If you owe the bank $100K and can’t pay, you have a problem. If you owe the bank $100 million and can’t pay, the bank has a problem.”

In Dubai’s case it’s around $80 billion.

Default and debt restructuring occur all the time, especially in the worst downturn of modern history.  The part that stings investors about Dubai, though, is the utter lack of transparency and potential subterfuge. For months, the emirate has been reassuring investors that it would be able to raise money and make its debt payments. 

Even Dubai’s ruler, Sheikh Mohammed gave worried investors the “talk to the hand” earlier this month, insisting that Dubai World (essentially his personal holding company) would be well capitalized and supported by Abu Dhabi, its rich neighbor.

Just a few weeks later, after months of tap-dancing, Dubai finally pulled back the curtain and confirmed investors’ fears– it had run out of cash. The nonchalant, innocuous way in which it was handled, however, will continue to infuriate investors for a very long time.

The reality is that lack of transparency defines the business culture in the Gulf region. I’ve been doing business and traveling there since 2001, and I can say unequivocally that this sort of behavior is typical. 

In an investment deal, for example, you never actually know where you stand until the moment they write the check. If they’re not interested, they will string you along for months and never actually say “no.”  In some parts of the Gulf, outright lying is considered to be the honorable thing to do.

Thus, it’s not surprising that while Dubai authorities were reassuring investors, local banks were busy raising money, preparing for what they knew was a certain outcome.

First Gulf Bank, for example, closed a $500 million issue for “general corporate purposes” less than a week before the Dubai news broke. Moreover, since September there has been a flurry of fund raising by banks and governments in the region, including the government of Qatar’s $7 billion debt issue this month.

Coincidence? Doubtful. Regional banks and governments likely seized the opportunity to raise cheap money while it was still available, probably with advanced knowledge of Dubai’s timeline. This is simply the way it’s done in the Gulf… and while it seems obtuse, there are some important things to keep in mind:

First, Abu Dhabi Islamic banking institutions are going to be just fine. The vast majority of Dubai exposure is with foreign banks, namely HSBC and RBS. Regardless, UAE’s central bank has indicated that it will support any bank that needs help, including the foreign banks.

Remember that the direct scope of the problem is ‘only’ $80 billion. This is equivalent to about a 2% drop in the Dow.

Abu Dhabi has already sustained losses of $125 billion so far in the financial crisis thanks to bad investments in western financial institutions like Citi. Yet with roughly $1 trillion in reserves and new oil revenue flowing in on a daily basis, this wealthy emirate is hardly breaking a sweat.
 
Dubai’s ruling Sheikh Mohammed, however, is going to have to dig deep to navigate his emirate through the downturn.

Foreign investors will certainly adopt a ‘fool me twice, shame on me’ attitude towards loaning any more money to the Sheikh. And with its credibility and creditworthiness in shambles, Dubai will likely cede its position as the region’s financial hub to Doha and Abu Dhabi.

I wrote about this just last month on October 27th:
—–
In a crunch, many of the companies under direct or indirect control of the ruling family had to go to the main office with hat in hand looking for funds. . . Dubai has become cash poor and its bills are piling up. . .

The price they are paying is great, but between this successful bond sale and the backing of big brother Abu Dhabi, Dubai’s cash flow issues should be solved for the next five years. . .

In the end, though, I think financial constraints prevent Dubai from winning– bruised and battered, it won’t make the final cut… always a contender, never again a champion.
—–

Now this outcome is even more certain. Dubai will recover financially with Abu Dhabi’s help, but investors won’t be able to wash out the sour taste.  Doha and Abu Dhabi will be there, cash in the bank, welcoming them with open arms.

** Lastly, a quick administrative reminder: if you signed up for the Panama Black Paper pre-notification, you will be receiving an email tomorrow with a purchase link.

Want More Information Like This?
Sign up below for the free newsletter Sovereign Man: Notes From The Field to get more information like the article you just read, plus exclusive information that is not posted publicly.


  • Roger

    In your pamphlet, “How to Move and Securely Store Gold Overseas” you recommend Dubai, and specifically Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank, as a place to safely store gold. Does anything in the present crisis change your thinking on this?

  • John Cleeve

    Mr. Black. This is the second of your articles I have read today (“I Finally Have to say Something About It” being the first) &, again, you have it right. I have lived in Abu Dhabi for seven years & have watched the disaster that is Dubai develop. Long term sustainability of Dubai – without the wealth & support of Abu Dhabi – as anything other than a desert was never possible. Property owners can only wait until the elevators stop working – when the initial maintenance agreements expire – & watch their investments evaporate. Or maybe hedge with investment in a service & maintenance company in Dubai.

    John Cleeve.

  • andrew

    I have to say that had the Rulers company not been called Dubai World and perhaps been called something else like GMC or Desert Holding then this would not have had the negative impact. Sure the banks have lent the self contained trading entity Dubai World 80bn and those banks have taken some security and no personal guarantees, so thats it, tough s…t. The land mass of Dubai and the Rulers of Dubai don’t owe anyone anything. We all know that if you give credit to a company which is limited then the word limited means a great deal. The banks are big boys and they should know their business. lets not beat up Sheik Mo for being a good business man and not giving banks guarantees. Dubai is not a disaster, I have owned and made a fortune off real estate there these past 8 years, so it has gone back to early 2007 values….it is up 30% since the bottom in March 2009 and the place is buzzing again right now. The sun is still shining, the tax is still zero and the crime is non existent. As for the wealth of the miserly Abu Dhabi, they have it because they never spent it, the place is a dump; well the Iranians and Indians and their wealth which really built Dubai make the Abu Dhabi donkeys look like paupers. Lets not forget how these Arabs made their money before oil – smuggling gold to India. As for service and maintenance companies, they don’t get paid, they are all on the creditor list. I don’t mean to be rude but Abu Dhabi may as well be a million miles from DXB.

Previous post:

Next post: