Why Latvia’s devaluation is certain

by Simon Black · View Comments

What if they held a bond auction and nobody came?

This is exactly what happened in Latvia a few weeks ago, as the country failed to receive a single bid for $16 million of debt, maturing in April 2010. In other words, investors were not willing to loan what amounts to international finance pocket change to a sovereign government for a measly 6-months.

Why? Because everyone expects that Latvia will devalue its currency; consequently, no one wants to be holding on to local assets there because the value of those assets will drop like rock once the Latvian government finally faces the music and devalues.

I talked about this in July “You Can profit from this countrys Devaluation ” after spending a great deal of time in the Baltics.  Latvia’s currency, the lat, is pegged to the euro at very high rate– the agreement was made in 2004 when Latvia’s economy was growing very rapidly. At the time, the peg seemed reasonable.

Today, Latvia’s economy is collapsing 17% per year, and the central bank is running out of funds to intercede in the market. In order to maintain the peg, Latvia’s central bank has to buy lats and sell euro, essentially creating artificial demand for the lat.  It can only do this for so long before it runs out of euro.

For months, it has been getting euro loans from rich European countries and supranational central banks. Each of these loans has been burned through as Latvia desperately tries to keep the peg alive.  For the euro lenders, this is akin to buying bonds in GM… it’s a lost cause, and any new money you throw at it will surely be lost.

European governments have sternly warned politicians in Latvia that severe austerity measures had better be implemented if they want more loan money. Realistically, though, Latvia would have to eliminate entire divisions of its government and economy in order to meet the EU’s budget demands.

This is not likely to happen.  Consequently, devaluation is looking more and more like the only remaining option.

The greatest fear of devaluation in Latvia is that locals who took out mortgages denominated in foreign currencies (because the interest rates were lower) would suddenly owe a hell of a lot more on the balance after devaluation.

For example, suppose someone took out a mortage of 100,000 at .7 lat = 1 euro.  Latvians think, earn, and spend in lat, so the borrower would consider his mortgage to be 70,000 lat. If Latvia devalues to 1 euro = 1 lat, his mortgage balance in euro would stay the same (100,000 euro), but the equivalent would now be 100,000 lat.

Well… that would certainly make for a bad day.  Imagine waking up one morning and owing another 40% on your mortgage when you already had negative equity to begin with!

Apparently, though, Latvia’s government has already thought this through this issue.

According to the Financial Times, Latvia’s legislature is taking steps to protect locals from the negative effects of a devaluation.  Any overnight increase in mortgage principal as the result of devaluation, for example, will have to be assumed by the bank, not the Latvian borrower.

With such a populist, consumer-protection policy designed to cushion the blow of a devaluation already in the works, there is little remaining for Latvia’s government to do but devalue. It is not a question of if, but when… unless something truly miraculous happens, like Latvia wins the sovereign equivalent of the lottery.

Investment banks like Barclays and RBC are betting that Latvia will devalue 15% by the end of 2010. Sweden’s largest banks (which are the also the largest lenders in Latvia) are  preparing for a devaluation scenario as well. They have to– devaluation in Latvia will hammer their balance sheets.

Swedbank, for example, has about 16% of its loan book in Latvia. When Latvia devalues, Swedbank’s equity will be hit hard and the stock price will suffer. In preparation, the bank conducted a $2.2 billion rights offering this month in order to cushion its balance sheet.

I still think shorting the banks is the best way to play this opportunity, but through carefully selected PUT options that limit risk exposure. If you directly short the stock, be prepared for a volatile run.

I think the market will also punish Sweden’s currency when devaluation occurs, so it would make sense to short the krona against the dollar, euro, and yen.

Let me know what you think about this strategy and if you have other ideas for how to profit.

Share this article using the links below:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • email
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us

  • Scott
    Simon,

    If everyone is aware of this issue then the currency market has already taken it into consideration and it will be reflected in price. After reviewing the daily chart on the EUR/DKK it would appear it has already bottomed as a result of the Latvian economic situation around 7.44. The banks already got the jump on everyone else. If anything buying it might not be a bad idea above 7.4460 and a stop at 7.4398. Just a thought. There are other currency pairs available that cost less with better entries. Good Luck, Simon, and thanks for the efforts overseas.

    Scott
  • Me
    Looking longer term and further afield than the simple Latvian debacle what is or will be interesting is how the European equity markets and the Euro fare as this saga unfolds. The Euro is one of, if not the most overvalued currency on the planet at present. The other is probably the ZAR but that is another story. Shorting the Euro against the metals on any weakness in the metals makes a lot of sense to me.

    Latvia is probably just a straw in the wind really but shows the inherent problems faced in Europe and the Baltics......many of which would not be problems should the Euro devalue.

    Personally I am slowly but surely adding long XAG/EUR and XAG/EUR positions. What concerns me mostly is how the market reacts to a breakdown in equity markets which I think is likely at least by first quarter of 2010 if not sooner. I will be watching and waiting to see how this plays itself out (if of course it happens at all) and looking load up on long metals positions mentioned above, dependent on the outcome.
  • Leland
    Hello Simon,
    Readers comment to resolve a question as to how to use puts for this
    case is great. Thanks and keep up the good work.

    Leland
  • henrik
    Hi Simon

    The banks might have to raise equity again for sure. However, their equity is not as shot anymore as last time you discussed this. Buy puts on SWED-A in Sweden, since this is the most liquid market. The spreads killed me in norway doing this on DNBNOR (which didn't fall either). And oviously, things take time, so longer maturities are probably smart. I'm tempted to do it again, but I am not sure if the massive downside is there anymore. Best, Henrik
  • Göran Högberg
    Interesting article, thank you.

    However, here in Sweden they have talked and written a lot about this and how it would influence the Swedish Krona.
    The latest news is that they will not devalue in the Baltics, the Swedish banks will manage and the krona is undervalued against the Euro at least. Againt the USD is another story, because the USD is undervalued.
  • Nick
    Hi Simon,
    I went looking online and found that Swedish banks certainly do have a disproportionate exposure to Latvia.

    The big question is: Will the European Central Bank and the IMF allow Latvia to devalue or will they bail them out? Will the banks convert these loans to the Latvian currency before a devaluation occurs?

    That’s up to you to decide.

    For now, let’s assume you’re right and Latvia will devalue…

    I went looking for a way to profit from this situation and realized that with a Latvian devaluation, the Swedish banks will indeed be hit and therefore the Swedish stock (equity) market as a whole.

    I then found that an ETF for the Swedish equity market exists. The ticker code is EWD and it trades on the NYSE. Better still, it offers options.

    I looked at the options and they are pretty thin and the spreads are wide. This means we have a potential to be stuck in a trade. It also means that the price of the ETF has to move more before we break even.

    The good news is that you don’t necessarily have to pay the ask price (I never do) and this options are prone to volatility spikes which mean that your options can gain a lot without much movement in the ETF itself.

    So let’s also assume we won’t get stuck in the trade and we can shave a bit off the bid / ask spread.

    I went and selected the April 2010 23 Put because I know you like longer term trades and because the 23 strike requires the least movement to double and it is also the cheapest option with that expiry relative to the other strikes (lowest implied volatility). If we shave a bit off and buy puts at $2.10 then we stand to double our money if the ETF drops to between $19 and $19.50. However, if we encounter an implied volatility spike like we have experienced 5 times this year so far, then we could easily double our money with the ETF only dropping to $22.50.

    So that’s one way to theoretically skin this cat. :)
  • Nick
    Well, if you had been quick you would have noticed that on Monday, November 2nd, we got a volitility spike I spoke of in the EWD option.

    Congrats, you just doubled your money in less than 3 days.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: