Why this may be the Great Deleveraging Part Zwei

by Simon Black · 12 comments

May 19, 2010
Quad Cities, IA, USA

I wanted to send you a short note today from America’s heartland to tell you what I’m doing with my investment capital, and why.

I’m closing out almost all of my speculative positions and going to sit on the sidelines for a bit because I’m concerned that the markets are entering another major deleveraging period.

Here are the facts which concern me-

1) Interbank lending in Europe is on the decline. Banks are now hesitant to lend to each other for fear and skepticism of what may be on others’ balance sheets; sovereign debt default has everyone worried, and lenders are mistrustful of anyone who may have exposure to the PIIGS.

The consequence is that European banks are now sitting on their cash and not extending credit to businesses, consumers, and investors. As the modern financial system depends entirely on the availability of credit, a major reduction in credit curtails output and demand, reducing asset prices.

We saw how a credit crunch affected asset prices in 2008, and what’s happening with European banks right now is similar.

2) Markets have been incredibly volatile lately, and this trend is likely to persist in the near term. Extreme volatility can often cause capital flight from risky markets, either due to margin calls or risk aversion.

When capital flees markets, prices fall. We also saw this in the autumn of 2008.

3) Government intervention is on the rise. Yesterday, Germany dropped an 800 pound gorilla on the markets by announcing a series of bans on certain short trades. Among the consequences is that credit markets now have reduced capability to hedge their exposure to risky sovereign debt.

In Switzerland, the central bank (SNB) has dramatically intervened in the currency market, boosting the euro by over 225 pips against the franc for a roughly 1.4% gain overnight. This is a huge move for a major currency.

History shows us that government interventions do not stabilize the markets. At best, intervention discourages private capital from participating in the markets; at worst, intervention encourages gross misallocations of private capital by trying to second-guess future interventionist moves.

Either way, the effect is negative for markets and asset prices.

4) Substantial risks still exist which could cause another leg down in the markets and create more capital losses for banks. These risks include sovereign debt erosion (which is happening), continued rise in foreclosures (which is happening), and a major currency crisis (which is unfolding).

In each of these cases, the net result will be reduced lending and credit availability as banks have to focus on rebuilding their balance sheets and increasing loss reserves.

Again, we saw the effects of these risk factors in 2008. Banks have been on the sidelines ever since, and the consequent lack of credit availability created major cash shortages in the broader economy.

The result is a fire sale of all assets, which causes steep price declines.

To be clear, I think this will affect the gold market as well, mostly because of the reciprocal effect of ETF instruments. The SPDR Gold ETF, better known as GLD, is allegedly the largest private holder of gold in the world.

In the event of a market meltdown, significant sales of ETF shares trigger a sale of gold holdings, which would in turn cause a further decline in the ETF shares, triggering more sales of gold holdings.

It’s a cycle of momentum. Just as we saw oil prices quickly rise to $147 in 2008, the inverse of this cycle is a rapid unwinding. Gold could get caught up in this because there is so much ETF exposure. Consider this if you are holding gold for speculative purposes.

Silver, however, would likely fall even more… and that’s why a bet on a rising gold/silver ratio is one of the few speculations that does make sense to me right now. I could see it rising from 63 to 75 or 80 in the near future.

In full disclosure, none of these assessments is a foregone conclusion in my book, but I see enough risk in the marketplace to take my speculative cash off the table… and that’s really what I wanted to tell you today.

I don’t have a high risk tolerance with my money, and when I see one ‘investment professional’ after another on CNBC telling me why I should jump into the markets because everything is rosy, I get really nervous.

The truth is that until there is some finality with the challenges in the eurozone (which will take quite some time), I don’t see how the markets can do any better than trading sideways.

Want More Information Like This?
Sign up below for the free newsletter Sovereign Man: Notes From The Field to get more information like the article you just read, plus exclusive information that is not posted publicly.


  • aaron

    Quad Cities?!?! That’s my home town. I live in Des Moines now. If you’re coming this way next I’d gladly buy you some dinner and/or a beer. Email me. :-)

  • Sean McLaughlin

    If you make it to Chicago, would love to buy you a beer.

  • chris

    I’m a little confused why you have seemingly changed your position on short euro/long gold. Is this just a temporary sidelining of that position while the volatility takes its course?

    Last week you wrote:

    “Additionally, for the time being, I’m happy to maintain my short euro/long gold position (XAUEUR) as I continue to believe that institutional funds are starting to shun government bonds in favor of gold. This position has returned us 30% since I first mentioned it a few months ago.”

    Is the German short ban the largest factor in your decision? Do you still have a pro short euro/long gold view after the current environment settles down?

    If anyone else has thoughts on this, pls share. Thanks all!

  • http://www.docaltman.com Dave

    Quad Cities. That’s my stomping ground. There are few reasons to go there. It would be great if you clued us in on what brings you there. Have you ever thought of having an impromptu get together in different cities your in?

  • http://dorianenterprizes.com/ Steve Kusaba

    This all makes sense but it is a very difficult position to be in because the strongest move in the pipes is likely the inverse of this. Rates being so low and so much money printing, as everyone already knows, is a recipe for mega inflation. So if the scenario plays out as you see it, (and this would be a good thing for a trader) best would be to sit in a lot of cash (shorting is even better) buy the crash low and go crazy in inflation devices which would be a game over home run. But in my experience the stories I tell in my head sometimes are at odds with reality so I am reminded about what Dave Landry told me: A. Do what ever you do slowly. B. Trade what is happening, not what you think.

    Your flexible approach to your location would be a good analogy to a way to play this. If money is rewarded by being in cash and short instruments, keep doing it and when reward comes to gold/silver and other inflation devices then go that direction. I have been raising cash for a while but still hold a large core position in gold/silver and uranium. I will not do anything but add to positions in the uranium on weakness (they never really bounced much out of the last crash and the cigar lake situation will likely crimp supply more than people think).

    Speaking of short side holdings, I have a bias towards the double short vehicles such as skf, qid, srs etc. because in a short position the best you can make is a double which never happens without a total crushing of the underlying but in the double short vehicles 3 baggers and even 10 baggers are possible. These things provide huge liquidity at crash bottoms which can really make you even bigger money!

    But a permanent seat at the trading screen might not be a bad idea for a few quarters.

  • Wendy

    That´s interesting. I´m buying Spanish companies, the PEs are getting extremely low. However, I do tend to jump in a bit early…

  • Larry

    Eric King and Ted Butler came out today and said that the commercials are covering their shorts right now! … this looks to be a very short lived correction in PMs

  • Stan

    Simon

    Sounds plausible but what are you holding your cash in? C$, S$, US$, A$, GBP, NOK? You have to be in something, I think.
    Stan

  • http://SovereignMan Barthalomew

    Thanks for the update and for sharing with us, Simon.

    I recall that you went long with some long term silver futures last fall at around $16. Are you including that position as one you’re liquidating?

    Most important, would you be kind enough to share what you are in still? As an example, would you be in Inverse Treasurys at this level? Do you like precious metals at this level? Would that include gold or silver stocks, by any chance? In other words, would you consider these as ‘risk positions’ or good places to hold one’s money.

    Per the above post, what do you like these days, and in what currency, and in which institutions, please?

    Also, you gave the impression that you liked the vaults in Austria, last year. If one wanted to go that way, how do you purchase the metal/coins? Is it best to ship it to yourself at a hotel over there (better to have coins or bullion?)?

    Is sending it UPS still viable, or will customs stop it?

    Is key to keep the amount small?

    Or, is it best to purchase the metal while over there? If so, if you don’t have a bank account there – how can you do that? Will a US bank wire into an Austrian banK? If that is the only way – then it sort of negates the privacy issue. Especially if one wants to keep it under $10k or under $5k. Important to stay legal, but would like to keep privacy, if possible.

    How can that best be achieved to keep legal and private in getting gold offshore in a trusted vault?

    These days, do you favor vaults in Austria or in Asia? If so, which one and key is how do you get it there, with most privacy, but keeping it legal. Do you just buy it there with a credit card or currency?

    Do you consider Boom a good way to go to get funds outside U.S.? Are they actually held in Asia? Do you think they are stable enough to withstand a big market blowoff, or would you like HSBC or another brokerage/bank better?

    What do you think of Canadian bank, in a safe deposit, for metals storage?

    Thanks, as always!

  • Jason Daniels

    Hello Simon, I am definitely ready to free myself and my family from corruption. We are moving to Costa Rica in a couple of months, and I need to be able to trade futures in an international brokerage account. Do you have any recommendations? I am very new to this, I am completely in the dark.

    • william peterson

      tips are not the way to be any kind of investor or speculator.You have to be sure of yourself and what works. You have to put your personality in with the true nature of what your investing in.When your systems works far more then it doesnot ,then enter into a trade that is true to your good system.You do not have to trade every day- only ehen the system says its right that what you can lean on and see the world through. Learn from your mistake and do not repeat them

  • Abcdstev

    Umm….and got (lol) that wasn't you …”your site” regarding my question about “Exposing the System!”

    Sorry …Steve

Previous post:

Next post: