The daily articles for February 24, 2010 and February 25, 2010 will not be posted to the website; they will only be circulated to email subscribers. Make sure you receive these articles by signing up for my daily e-letter, Notes from the Field.

Share this article using the links below:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • email
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

February 23, 2010
Pattaya, Thailand

Throughout our conversations, we have routinely discussed the importance of planting multiple flags.

If you live, work, bank, invest, own a business, and hold your assets in the same country of your citizenship, you are putting all of your eggs in one basket, and once that basket heads in the wrong direction, you can kiss your assets goodbye.

There are nearly infinite possibilities that pose substantial risks to your wealth and security, including taxes, litigation, confiscation, inflation, regulation, and good ole’ fashioned social decay.

Making the effort to move assets overseas, diversify your currency holdings, buy foreign property, set up foreign structures to operate a business, etc. are all major steps in the right direction to preserve your livelihood and safety.

If you have executed only a few of those steps, you are ahead of the 99% of the population. You will be safe while others watch their freedoms, their wealth, and their critical thinking be eroded by corrupt bureaucrats and the mainstream media.

One of the ultimate tools in preserving wealth, freedom, and security that we have touched on before is acquiring a second passport. This tool provides additional freedoms of travel, possible tax advantages, banking convenience, an escape hatch, and security.

After all, nobody hijacks a plane and threatens to kill all the Lithuanians.

Most importantly, when your home country starts heading in a catastrophic direction, a second (or third, fourth, etc.) citizenship provides you with options… and that’s what real freedom is all about– the power to choose.

Even without a cataclysmic event in your home country, a second passport pays big dividends. With a second passport, suddenly you find that you can open bank accounts and travel much more easily.

In my case, since I travel so much, the money that I have saved on visa fees alone has more than offset the cost of acquiring a second passport.

So how do you go about obtaining one?

For starters, if you’re a member of the lucky bloodline club, you may have been born as a second or third generation citizen somewhere. Many countries have programs which grant citizenship to descendents of emigrants– Ireland, Poland, India, and Italy are examples.

If, for instance, you could prove your lineage to Irish grandparents, you would have a case to apply for Irish citizenship. There are many more countries which have such programs, but I’ll save that topic for another time.

Second, there are a handful of countries where you simply pay for citizenship, either through an official program, or an unofficial program.

In terms of official programs, most people who have done even the most cursory research have read about Dominica and St. Kitts, both of which charge about $200,000 to $450,000 for citizenship.  These are the most famous, but there are others, including Austria and even the United States.

If I have my way in this part of the world, there will soon be one more.

Yesterday I mentioned that ousted former Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra is traveling around the world on passports from Nicaragua and the Bahamas… and not because those countries have official programs for ordinary investors, but because Thaksin used his connections to make compelling donations.

Clearly, unofficial programs generally come down to knowing somebody of significant influence in the government. In most countries, the head of state has the authority to naturalize a foreigner at his/her discretion, and this happens frequently in small countries that have been assisted by the actions or donations of a particular individual.

Now… assuming that you don’t have any heads of state in your rolodex, aren’t descended from Polish grandparents, and don’t want to swallow a $250,000 pill for St. Kitts citizenship, the next category applies to you.

I call it ‘connected’ citizenship, in which an individual can become naturalized through some sort of connection to the country.  Typically this can be a combination of residency, marriage, adoption, religious affiliation, and of course, birth.

Obviously we can’t go back in time to change our place of birth, but the others may be well within our control, particularly residency.  In fact, most countries provide a means for naturalization through residency, including the United States and Canada.  But there are three important factors that determine whether a residency program is worthwhile:

First, how long do you have to be a resident in order to be eligible for citizenship? If you have 8 to 10 years to kill, you may want to consider putting the time in for France or Italy. But most people want something much faster, 1-4 years at most.

Second, how hard is it to actually obtain residency? In the United States, for example, residency applications are scrutinized and generally rejected– hence the inordinate number of undocumented workers. In practice, America now sends the tired, poor, huddled masses back where they came from.

Contrast that with, say, Singapore, where anyone with a good idea, strong work ethic, or investment capital is a strong candidate for residency through an easy, painless, transparent selection system.

Third, do you actually have to live there? Many countries’ naturalization regulations require an applicant to spend the preponderance of his/her time in that country. Canada is a great example… if you become a Canadian resident and spend too much time out of the country, you render yourself ineligible for citizenship.

For the next two days, I’m going to discuss two such countries that fit these requirements that I think you should strongly consider if you’re interested in second citizenship.

** Note, I only plan on releasing this information to email subscribers and will not be posting either article on the website. If you want to receive these articles, make sure you sign up for the daily e-letter here before tomorrow.

Share this article using the links below:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • email
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us

{ 16 comments }

February 22, 2010
Pattaya, Thailand

I was in the back of a black sedan on Friday morning speeding along Highway 7 from Pattaya to Bangkok when my driver’s phone rang. He picked up, jabbered for a few seconds, and then said to me:

“Sir, my friend call me from Bangkok; he say big protests in city, we need to go around.”

“No chance–” I replied. “Let’s go see how serious they are this time…”

Here in Thailand, you have to be living under a cave to not know what’s going on in the political scene. It starts with former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, who was ousted by the Thai military while he was out of the country in 2006.

He’s one of the richest men in Thailand having amassed a fortune in the telecom industry, and among other things, Thaksin has been accused of corruption, tax evasion, censorship, and human rights violations.

About half of Thailand loves him, the other half hates him… it just so happens that the current administration falls on the side of hating him, and they have issued several warrants for his arrest.

In fact, shortly after the 2006 coup, the new government set up a commission to investigate Thaksin’s financial holdings; it was ruled that he accumulated an unusual fortune during his time in office, and roughly $2.3 billion of his assets were frozen pending further investigation.

Years later, an official legal judgment has yet to be made about Thaksin’s frozen assets… until this week.

This Friday, February 26, is known as Judgment Day in Thailand because a high court will finally rule on the fate of his assets.

Did he evade taxes? Did he use public office for personal gain? Or did he follow the letter of the law and become victimized by Thailand’s notoriously corrupt politicking? The verdict is set to galvanize the country as many Thais regard it as a referendum on the corruption of their political institution.

There have already been mass demonstrations leading up to the decision by a group known as the “Red Shirts,” who in many ways are like the Tea Party protesters in the United States.

Like the Tea Party, the Red Shirts are commonly unified by their desire for acute political change. They despise the current administration and everything it has done to their country, yet many of the Red Shirts are undecided about Thaksin… sort of like Sarah Palin.

Many regard him as a free market hero who can liberalize the economy, while others find him to be just another self-serving politician… though not necessarily guilty of the charges against him.

The protests on Friday were held by the Red Shirts who shut down several streets and chanted refrains about freedom, justice, and change. I jumped in the thick of it to get a sense of their passions… are they true believers, or simply going through the motions?

I was surprised at what I saw.

The thing is, in Thailand, these sorts of protests and mini political revolutions are about as common as seeing a military parade in North Korea or the Bellagio fountains in Las Vegas– if you miss it, just wait around for another few hours.

Oh yeah, and they sell T-shirts. Lot’s of souvenirs, actually… something like “I went to the revolution in Thailand and all I got was this lousy T-shirt” sort of thing.

It’s widely expected that the outcome of the “Judgment Day” decision will result in nationwide protests and rioting, regardless of the outcome. That makes for a lot of t-shirt sales.

As you could imagine, foreign governments are totally overreacting. The British and US embassies are urging their citizens to exercise caution; and if there are wide-scale protests, you can count on the mainstream media to portray Thailand as a country coming apart at the seams.

Truthfully, Thailand will be just fine. Both foreigners and locals alike are accustomed to political instability… it’s par for the course in Thailand. Government or no government, Thailand is one of the most peaceful places on earth.

Case in point, Pattaya is probably the most international city per capita I have ever been to– Russians, Americans, Canadians, Brits, Germans, French, Thai, Indians, Pakistanis, Chinese, Malaysians, Japanese, Aussies, Arabs, and Jews, all living in one place in complete harmony.

Why? Because they’re here for the same things– ultra-low cost of living, privacy, warm weather, quality medical care, high class lifestyle, and of course, cheap sex.

These factors trump politics any day of the week, and they won’t go away just because of a couple of protests.

If Thaksin is able to engineer a real revolution, he will make his return to Thailand. In the meantime, he is enjoying the fruits of having planted multiple flags and traveling around the world on second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth passports from friendly jurisdictions in the Caribbean, Asia, and Latin America.

Let’s talk about these later this week. Stay tuned.

Share this article using the links below:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • email
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

February 19, 2010
Bangkok, Thailand

I really need to start out today’s letter by expressing how truly humbled I am to be part of such a fantastic community.

Matt and I have spent much of the last few days combing through resumes (200+ so far) for the job openings that I posted on Monday, and the caliber of talent and energy is really impressive.

Applicants vary in age from 17 to 70. They come from all stations of life– corporate executive, successful entrepreneur, student, homemaker; and they  hail from at least 18 different countries, from Guyana to China to the Netherlands to South Africa.

I’ve read every email with great interest and have made difficult choices to narrow down the pool of candidates. If you submitted an email, you might just be hearing from me in the next week or two.

Now… on to this week’s questions.
Read More…

Share this article using the links below:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • email
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us

{ 7 comments }

February 18, 2010
Bangkok, Thailand

Panama is one of those countries that registers a lot of interest from potential expats… and with good reason. It’s cheap, it’s close to North America, it has a strong and stable economy, and it’s full of opportunity for an ambitious investor and entrepreneur.

Over the past few months I have received numerous requests for more information about Panamanian property– it seems that people are finally starting to take action and getting prepared to internationalize themselves.

Of course, buying overseas property is one of the best ways to do this– property transactions are not reportable, and the capital that you park in real estate cannot be forcibly repatriated– once it leaves your home country, it’s much safer.

One of the major pitfalls of foreign property transactions that I’ve noticed over the years is when people entrust their capital to an incompetent or shady real estate agent.

It happens more often than you think– someone who looks good and sounds good, but whose opinion absolutely cannot be trusted. Panama is unfortunately full of people like this– charlatans who masquerade as real estate professionals.

In fact, I published a case study several weeks ago describing the experiences of a woman who trusted the advice of a real estate agent in Panama that sold her into a building with a condemned sewage system.

The right advice truly makes all the difference in the world, and that’s why I want to share with you some insider information about the Panama real estate market courtesy of the person who I have found to be the absolute best in the business.

His name is Ulrich Schwark; he and his partner Peter run one of Panama’s most successful real estate agencies, and they are hands down the most knowledgeable real estate professionals I have come across in the country.

Why? Because they are sharp investors themselves… they understand value, they understand risk, they understand long-term trends. And as Europeans, they can relate to foreigners and high standards of quality.

I’ve been operating in Panama for over 7-years, and I’ve met hundreds of ‘agents.’  Most of them are simply cheerleaders riding the wave. Ulrich and Peter understand the ebbs and flows of the tide and how to make money across the entire cycle.

I recently conducted a short interview with Ulrich in which he discusses the state of the market, where the best value and investments are, and a handful of really undervalued deals that he currently has available.

You can access the 30-minute interview here in mp3 format:

http://media.libsyn.com/media/withoutborders/Panama-property-interview.mp3

If you have any interest in Panamanian real estate, you should absolutely get in touch with Ulrich. The best way to reach him is to fill out this short form that describes the sort of property you might be looking for:

http://www.sovereignman.com/panama-property-interest

The information you provide is completely confidential and will go directly to Ulrich’s desk.

Share this article using the links below:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • email
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us

{ 4 comments }

February 17, 2010
Bangkok, Thailand

I couldn’t believe what I was hearing… and I found myself wondering out loud- “Are these people insane??”

Apparently, yes.

I was watching Richard Edelman this morning on Bloomberg Television discussing the latest results of his research and PR firm’s annual “trust survey.”  Edelman takes a scientific poll each year, drawing on a global pool of educated, well-informed people from G20 nations.

The theme is always the same– trust.  Edelman’s research gives an indication of the public’s confidence in the private sector, the banking industry, NGOs, the mainstream media, and of course, the government.

For example, I wasn’t surprised to hear that public trust had fallen for corporations and the financial sector since last year. Edelman’s data suggest that people are more leery of business than in the aftermath of the Enron scandal, and only 29% of respondents trust what a CEO says about his/her company.

Given what has happened with the Goldman/AIG sweetheart deals, the Toyota recall, the socialization of Chrysler and GM, etc., this sentiment is to be expected.

What was shocking to me, though, was that the US public’s trust in their government and political leaders actually increased from last year– 46% of Americans trust in their government to do the right thing, which is more than the French (43%), German (46%), British (38%) and Russian (38%) believe.

What’s more, Americans’ trust in their government increased by over half of 2009’s level– a 53% increase, proportionally, from last year.  Who were they interviewing?? Barack Obama’s kindergarten teacher? The guy who owns a warehouse full of “Real Change We Can Believe In” bumper stickers?

Among major nations, only the Chinese at 74% had more confidence in their government.

Economically, 65% of respondents worldwide, including 61% in the United States, said that they want governments to *increase* control over all industries, and fewer than half of the Americans polled believe that the free market should be allowed to operate without significant government influence.

These indications are really unfortunate, because when the people ask for more government control, they will absolutely get what they deserve.  And once power has been vested to the government by the people, it almost takes a revolution to wrestle it back.

If you’re one of the minority who can properly identify runaway governments as the problem and not the solution, you should really think hard about your options.

Expatriation is often too radical a concept for most people, especially those who find themselves chained to geography by factors like job, money, and family.

Personally I would argue that family is one of the chief reasons to expatriate, and that most people would have more financial success and live a better, cleaner lifestyle overseas.

If fear and uncertainty are preventing you from making a move, I would advise that you at least get your feet wet by internationalizing yourself in baby steps.

For example, definitely consider purchasing foreign property as a first step– buying property is definitely the best way to move money between countries.  It also makes for a great investment, provides you with an emergency landing pad, and frankly gives you a reason to travel from time to time.

Do your research and buy in a free country that has a stable economy and fiscal discipline.

Panama is an excellent example– the country’s debt level is currently a manageable 45% of GDP, and the government is astutely borrowing a bit of very cheap money to make lucrative infrastructure investments that will yield a soundly positive ROI.

Furthermore, as the country continues to experience a solid growth rate and manage its debt levels, Panama’s proportion of external debt to GDP should continue to decline in the foreseeable future.

In fact, Panama is one of just a handful of countries that experienced positive GDP growth last year, and you can see evidence of this on the ground. There are currently some attractive investment opportunities in the property market, as well as fairly straightforward bank financing available.

I promised a few weeks ago to bring you some inside information about Panama’s property market, and I intend on doing that tomorrow. More to follow.

Share this article using the links below:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • email
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us

{ 7 comments }

February 16, 2010
Bangkok, Thailand

The popular press has been bandying a lot of cute acronyms for the ’sick’ European countries. I have seen PIIGS, STUPIDs, and DUHs… and while the individual circumstances of each country are different, they all have one thing in common–

Their obligations far exceed their assets, and they have to borrow money just to pay interest on the money that they’ve already borrowed.

We don’t need a new acronym because there’s already a word for it: junkie. Before too long, the entire euro zone may be heading in this direction… in fact, while the final nail may be a long way off, markets are clearly starting to build a coffin for the euro.
Read More…

Share this article using the links below:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • email
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us

{ 4 comments }

February 15, 2010
Pattaya, Thailand

I’m going to be candid with you– I’ve got too much on my plate. Sometimes one of the consequences of being a global opportunist is taking on too many deals… and getting swamped.

To give you an idea of the deals I’m talking about, there’s a real estate deal in Thailand, an Asia-based entertainment venture, a North American financial services company, a new software company, a retail products manufacturer, potentially a sustainable project in Panama, and of course, this daily letter.

Right now our team consists only of myself, my business partner Matt (who is frankly one of the best entrepreneurs I’ve ever come across), and a small support staff. We don’t like big, unwieldy offices and layers of bureaucracy… We keep things lean and lethal by surrounding ourselves with a small number of incredibly talented and driven individuals.

Because the workload is starting to overwhelm us, though, we’ve decided to expand a bit.  We have a rule, though, when it comes to working with others: we only do business with people we like.

As such, instead of looking externally for the right people we’re starting our search within the SovereignMan community where we know we’ll find the kinds of people we’d like to be around.

I’m going to start with the easy ones first:
Read More…

Share this article using the links below:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • email
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us

{ 8 comments }